Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India.
BMC Med Educ. 2011 Jun 17;11:37. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-37.
Distance learning may be useful for building health research capacity. However, evidence that it can improve knowledge and skills in health research, particularly in resource-poor settings, is limited. We compared the impact and acceptability of teaching two distinct content areas, Biostatistics and Research Ethics, through either on-line distance learning format or traditional on-site training, in a randomized study in India. Our objective was to determine whether on-line courses in Biostatistics and Research Ethics could achieve similar improvements in knowledge, as traditional on-site, classroom-based courses.
Volunteer Indian scientists were randomly assigned to one of two arms.
Students in Arm 1 attended a 3.5-day on-site course in Biostatistics and completed a 3.5-week on-line course in Research Ethics. Students in Arm 2 attended a 3.5-week on-line course in Biostatistics and 3.5-day on-site course in Research Ethics. For the two course formats, learning objectives, course contents and knowledge tests were identical.
Improvement in knowledge immediately and 3-months after course completion, compared to baseline.
Baseline characteristics were similar in both arms (n = 29 each). Median knowledge score for Biostatistics increased from a baseline of 49% to 64% (p < 0.001) 3 months after the on-site course, and from 48% to 63% (p = 0.009) after the on-line course. For the on-site Research Ethics course, median score increased from 69% to 83% (p = 0.005), and for the on-line Research Ethics course from 62% to 80% (p < 0.001). Three months after the course, median gains in knowledge scores remained similar for the on-site and on-line platforms for both Biostatistics (16% vs. 12%; p = 0.59) and Research Ethics (17% vs. 13%; p = 0.14).
On-line and on-site training formats led to marked and similar improvements of knowledge in Biostatistics and Research Ethics. This, combined with logistical and cost advantages of on-line training, may make on-line courses particularly useful for expanding health research capacity in resource-limited settings.
远程学习可能有助于建立卫生研究能力。然而,关于它是否能提高卫生研究方面的知识和技能,尤其是在资源匮乏的环境下,证据有限。我们在印度进行了一项随机研究,比较了通过在线远程学习模式或传统现场培训教授两个不同的内容领域(生物统计学和研究伦理)的效果和可接受性。我们的目标是确定在线生物统计学和研究伦理课程是否可以像传统现场课堂课程一样,在知识方面取得类似的提高。
印度志愿科学家被随机分配到两个组中的一个。
第 1 组学生参加为期 3.5 天的现场生物统计学课程,并完成为期 3.5 周的在线研究伦理课程。第 2 组学生参加为期 3.5 周的在线生物统计学课程和为期 3.5 天的现场研究伦理课程。对于两种课程形式,学习目标、课程内容和知识测试都是相同的。
与课程开始前相比,课程结束后立即和 3 个月后的知识提高情况。
两组的基线特征相似(每组 29 人)。生物统计学的知识得分中位数从现场课程开始前的 49%提高到 3 个月后的 64%(p < 0.001),从在线课程开始前的 48%提高到 63%(p = 0.009)。现场研究伦理课程的得分中位数从 69%提高到 83%(p = 0.005),在线研究伦理课程的得分中位数从 62%提高到 80%(p < 0.001)。课程结束 3 个月后,现场和在线平台在生物统计学(16%比 12%;p = 0.59)和研究伦理(17%比 13%;p = 0.14)方面的知识得分提高情况相似。
在线和现场培训模式都能显著提高生物统计学和研究伦理方面的知识,而且在线培训具有后勤和成本优势,这使得在线课程特别适用于在资源有限的环境下扩大卫生研究能力。