Suppr超能文献

尼姆斯延续性问卷:一种测量医疗照护延续性的问卷开发与测试

Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire: development and testing of a questionnaire that measures continuity of care.

机构信息

Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, 117, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1391-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.006.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop and pilot test a generic questionnaire to measure continuity of care from the patient's perspective across primary and secondary care settings.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We developed the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire (NCQ) based on a systematic literature review and analysis of 30 patient interviews. The questionnaire consisted of 16 items about the patient-provider relationship to be answered for five different care providers and 14 items each on the collaboration between four groups of care providers. The questionnaire was distributed among patients with a chronic disease recruited from general practice. We used principal component analysis (PCA) to identify subscales. We refined the factors by excluding several items, for example, items with a high missing rate.

RESULTS

In total, 288 patients filled out the questionnaire (response rate, 72%). PCA yielded three subscales: "personal continuity: care provider knows me," "personal continuity: care provider shows commitment," and "team/cross-boundary continuity." Internal consistency of the subscales ranged from 0.82 to 0.89. Interscale correlations varied between 0.42 and 0.61.

CONCLUSION

The NCQ shows to be a comprehensive, reliable, and valid instrument. Further testing of reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness is needed before the NCQ can be more widely implemented.

摘要

目的

开发并初步测试一种通用问卷,以衡量患者在初级和二级保健环境中的连续性护理。

研究设计和设置

我们基于系统文献回顾和对 30 名患者访谈的分析,制定了奈梅亨连续性问卷(NCQ)。该问卷由 16 个关于医患关系的项目组成,需要回答 5 个不同的医护提供者,另外还有 14 个关于 4 组医护提供者之间合作的项目。问卷分发给从普通诊所招募的慢性病患者。我们使用主成分分析(PCA)来识别子量表。我们通过排除几个项目来改进这些因素,例如,高缺失率的项目。

结果

共有 288 名患者填写了问卷(应答率为 72%)。PCA 产生了三个子量表:“个人连续性:医护提供者了解我”、“个人连续性:医护提供者表现出承诺”和“团队/跨边界连续性”。子量表的内部一致性在 0.82 到 0.89 之间。量表间的相关性在 0.42 到 0.61 之间。

结论

NCQ 是一种全面、可靠和有效的工具。在更广泛地实施 NCQ 之前,还需要进一步测试其可靠性、结构有效性和响应能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验