Suppr超能文献

炎症生物标志物与重症社区获得性肺炎患者入住重症监护病房的预测。

Inflammatory biomarkers and prediction for intensive care unit admission in severe community-acquired pneumonia.

机构信息

Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos and Servicio de Neumologia, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2011 Oct;39(10):2211-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182257445.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Increased inflammatory response is related to severity and outcome in community-acquired pneumonia, but the role of inflammatory biomarkers in deciding intensive care unit admission is unknown. We assessed the relationship between inflammatory response, prediction for intensive care unit admission, delayed intensive care unit admission, and outcome in patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical study.

SETTING

Intensive care units of two university hospitals.

PATIENTS

We included 627 ward and 58 intensive care unit patients with community-acquired pneumonia, 36 with direct and 22 with delayed intensive care unit admission.

INTERVENTIONS

Serum levels of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and interleukin-10 at admission.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We assessed the prediction for intensive care unit admission of biomarkers and the Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society guidelines minor criteria for severe community-acquired pneumonia. Procalcitonin (p=.001), C-reactive protein (p=.005), tumor necrosis factor-α (p=.042), and interleukin-6 (p=.003) levels were higher in intensive care unit-admitted patients; however, the Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society guidelines minor severity criteria predicted better intensive care unit admission (odds ratio, 12.03; 95% confidence interval, 5.13-28.20; p<.001). No patient with severe community-acquired pneumonia by three or more minor severity criteria and procalcitonin levels below the optimal cutoff (0.35 ng/mL) needed intensive care unit admission compared with 14 (23%) with levels above the cutoff (p=.032). In patients initially admitted to wards, procalcitonin (p=.012) and C-reactive protein (p=.039) were higher in those 22 patients subsequently transferred to the intensive care unit after adjusting for age, comorbidities, and Pneumonia Severity Index risk class. Despite initially admitted to wards, 14 (64%) patients with delayed intensive care unit admission had already criteria for severe community-acquired pneumonia at admission compared with 73 (12%) ward patients (p<.001).

CONCLUSION

Inflammatory biomarkers identified patients needing intensive care unit admission, including those with delayed intensive care unit admission. Patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia by minor criteria and low levels of procalcitonin may be safely admitted to wards. Correctly applying the Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society guidelines would reduce substantially delayed intensive care unit admission.

摘要

目的

炎症反应增加与社区获得性肺炎的严重程度和结局相关,但炎症生物标志物在决定是否入住重症监护病房方面的作用尚不清楚。我们评估了炎症反应与入住重症监护病房、延迟入住重症监护病房以及社区获得性肺炎患者结局之间的关系。

设计

前瞻性临床研究。

地点

两所大学医院的重症监护病房。

患者

我们纳入了 627 名普通病房和 58 名重症监护病房的社区获得性肺炎患者,其中 36 名直接入住重症监护病房,22 名延迟入住重症监护病房。

干预措施

入院时检测 C 反应蛋白、降钙素原、肿瘤坏死因子-α、白细胞介素-1、白细胞介素-6、白细胞介素-8 和白细胞介素-10 的血清水平。

测量和主要结果

我们评估了生物标志物和美国传染病学会/美国胸科学会(IDSA/ATS)社区获得性肺炎严重程度标准次要标准对入住重症监护病房的预测作用。入住重症监护病房的患者降钙素原(p=0.001)、C 反应蛋白(p=0.005)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(p=0.042)和白细胞介素-6(p=0.003)水平较高;然而,IDSA/ATS 社区获得性肺炎严重程度标准次要标准预测入住重症监护病房的效果更好(比值比,12.03;95%置信区间,5.13-28.20;p<.001)。与超过临界值(0.35ng/ml)的患者相比,没有任何一位符合三个以上次要严重标准和降钙素原水平低于最佳临界值的严重社区获得性肺炎患者需要入住重症监护病房(p=0.032)。在最初入住普通病房的患者中,22 名患者在调整年龄、合并症和肺炎严重指数风险类别后,转移至重症监护病房后,降钙素原(p=0.012)和 C 反应蛋白(p=0.039)水平较高。尽管最初入住普通病房,但与普通病房的 73 名患者(12%)相比,14 名(64%)延迟入住重症监护病房的患者入院时已经符合严重社区获得性肺炎的标准(p<.001)。

结论

炎症生物标志物可识别需要入住重症监护病房的患者,包括延迟入住重症监护病房的患者。符合 IDSA/ATS 社区获得性肺炎严重程度标准次要标准且降钙素原水平较低的患者可安全入住普通病房。正确应用 IDSA/ATS 指南可显著减少延迟入住重症监护病房的患者数量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验