NIHR King's Patient Safety and Service Quality Research Centre, King's College London, Strand, London, UK.
Health Expect. 2012 Dec;15(4):424-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00695.x. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
There has been considerable momentum within the NHS over the last 10 years to develop greater patient and public involvement (PPI). This commitment has been reflected in numerous policy initiatives. In patient safety, the drive to increase involvement has increasingly been seen as an important way of building a safety culture. Evidence suggests, however, that progress has been slow and even more variable than in health care generally. Given this context, the paper analyses some of the key underlying drivers for involvement in the wider context of health and social care and makes some suggestions on what lessons can be learned for developing the PPI agenda in patient safety. To develop PPI further, it is argued that a greater understanding is needed of the contested nature of involvement in patient safety and how this has similarities to the emergence of user involvement in other parts of the public services. This understanding has led to the development of a range of critical theories to guide involvement that also make more explicit the underlying factors that support and hinder involvement processes, often related to power inequities and control. Achieving greater PPI in patient safety is therefore seen to require a more critical framework for understanding processes of involvement that can also help guide and evaluate involvement practices.
在过去的 10 年中,NHS 内部在发展更大程度的患者和公众参与(PPI)方面已经取得了相当大的进展。这一承诺反映在众多政策举措中。在患者安全方面,越来越多的人认为增加参与度是建立安全文化的重要途径。然而,有证据表明,进展缓慢,甚至比一般医疗保健更为多变。鉴于这种情况,本文分析了在更广泛的健康和社会护理背景下参与的一些关键潜在驱动因素,并就如何为患者安全的 PPI 议程提供一些经验教训提出了一些建议。为了进一步发展 PPI,人们认为需要更深入地了解患者安全参与的争议性本质,以及这如何与用户在公共服务其他领域的参与的出现相似。这种理解导致了一系列批判性理论的发展,这些理论指导着参与,也更明确地揭示了支持和阻碍参与过程的潜在因素,这些因素通常与权力不平等和控制有关。因此,要在患者安全方面实现更大程度的 PPI,就需要一个更具批判性的框架来理解参与过程,这也有助于指导和评估参与实践。