Suppr超能文献

发展一种“批判”的方法来让患者和公众参与国民保健服务中的患者安全:从公共部门的其他部分吸取教训?

Developing a 'critical' approach to patient and public involvement in patient safety in the NHS: learning lessons from other parts of the public sector?

机构信息

NIHR King's Patient Safety and Service Quality Research Centre, King's College London, Strand, London, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2012 Dec;15(4):424-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00695.x. Epub 2011 Jun 29.

Abstract

There has been considerable momentum within the NHS over the last 10 years to develop greater patient and public involvement (PPI). This commitment has been reflected in numerous policy initiatives. In patient safety, the drive to increase involvement has increasingly been seen as an important way of building a safety culture. Evidence suggests, however, that progress has been slow and even more variable than in health care generally. Given this context, the paper analyses some of the key underlying drivers for involvement in the wider context of health and social care and makes some suggestions on what lessons can be learned for developing the PPI agenda in patient safety. To develop PPI further, it is argued that a greater understanding is needed of the contested nature of involvement in patient safety and how this has similarities to the emergence of user involvement in other parts of the public services. This understanding has led to the development of a range of critical theories to guide involvement that also make more explicit the underlying factors that support and hinder involvement processes, often related to power inequities and control. Achieving greater PPI in patient safety is therefore seen to require a more critical framework for understanding processes of involvement that can also help guide and evaluate involvement practices.

摘要

在过去的 10 年中,NHS 内部在发展更大程度的患者和公众参与(PPI)方面已经取得了相当大的进展。这一承诺反映在众多政策举措中。在患者安全方面,越来越多的人认为增加参与度是建立安全文化的重要途径。然而,有证据表明,进展缓慢,甚至比一般医疗保健更为多变。鉴于这种情况,本文分析了在更广泛的健康和社会护理背景下参与的一些关键潜在驱动因素,并就如何为患者安全的 PPI 议程提供一些经验教训提出了一些建议。为了进一步发展 PPI,人们认为需要更深入地了解患者安全参与的争议性本质,以及这如何与用户在公共服务其他领域的参与的出现相似。这种理解导致了一系列批判性理论的发展,这些理论指导着参与,也更明确地揭示了支持和阻碍参与过程的潜在因素,这些因素通常与权力不平等和控制有关。因此,要在患者安全方面实现更大程度的 PPI,就需要一个更具批判性的框架来理解参与过程,这也有助于指导和评估参与实践。

相似文献

3
The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Feb;24(1):28-38. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr066. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
4
Primary care-led commissioning and public involvement in the English National Health Service. Lessons from the past.
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2015 May;16(3):289-303. doi: 10.1017/S1463423614000486. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
6
Whose voices? Patient and public involvement in clinical commissioning.
Health Expect. 2017 Jun;20(3):484-494. doi: 10.1111/hex.12475. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
8
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
9
10
Patient and public involvement: what next for the NHS?
Health Expect. 2007 Jun;10(2):129-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00427.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Human Healthcare and Its Pharmacy Component from a Safety Point of View.
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Apr 7;12(2):64. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12020064.
2
Value, transparency, and inclusion: A values-based study of patient involvement in musculoskeletal research.
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 1;16(12):e0260617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260617. eCollection 2021.
6
Giving patients a voice: implementing patient and public involvement to strengthen research in sub-Saharan Africa.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Apr;74(4):307-310. doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-212525. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
7
9
Creating a database of internet-based clinical trials to support a public-led research programme: A descriptive analysis.
Digit Health. 2015 Nov 20;1:2055207615617854. doi: 10.1177/2055207615617854. eCollection 2015 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Harmed patients gaining voice: challenging dominant perspectives in the construction of medical harm and patient safety reforms.
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Aug;71(3):510-516. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.03.050. Epub 2010 May 8.
2
Communication with patients after errors.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010 Jan;15 Suppl 1:56-9. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2009.09s107.
3
Scoping review and approach to appraisal of interventions intended to involve patients in patient safety.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010 Jan;15 Suppl 1:17-25. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2009.009040.
4
Revolution or evolution: the challenges of conceptualizing patient and public involvement in a consumerist world.
Health Expect. 2009 Sep;12(3):275-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00564.x.
5
The challenge of quality and patient safety.
J R Soc Med. 2008 Jul;101(7):338-41. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2008.nh8003.
7
Patient involvement in patient safety: what factors influence patient participation and engagement?
Health Expect. 2007 Sep;10(3):259-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00450.x.
8
The snakes and ladders of user involvement: Moving beyond Arnstein.
Health Policy. 2006 Apr;76(2):156-68. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.05.008. Epub 2005 Jul 11.
9
Embodied health movements: new approaches to social movements in health.
Sociol Health Illn. 2004 Jan;26(1):50-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2004.00378.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验