Department of Informatics and Media, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Cult Health Sex. 2011 Sep;13(8):917-31. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2011.589080. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
The Ugandan Anti-Homosexuality Bill of October 2009 caused an international outcry and sparked intense debate in the local and international media. Particularly contentious was its proposal to impose the death penalty for acts of 'aggravated homosexuality'. Through a quantitative content analysis of 176 items from two main daily newspapers, the government-owned New Vision and the privately-owned Daily Monitor, over the period October 2009-June 2010, combined with qualitative interviews with human rights defenders in Uganda, this study explores attempts made by local human rights advocates to influence the media's coverage of the Bill and the extent to which these attempts were successful. The study finds that while there are significant differences between the frequency of reporting on the Bill in the two newspapers, both papers devoted little editorial space to the public health and human rights concerns put forward by local human rights organizations. Despite Uganda's recent and often lauded history of openly addressing HIV/AIDS, human right organizations' attempts to highlight the Bill's potentially adverse effects on the country's ability to tackle the epidemic effectively were only partially successful and, interestingly, awarded much less attention than the potential human rights implications of the proposed change in legislation.
2009 年 10 月的乌干达反同性恋法案在国际上引起了强烈反响,并在当地和国际媒体上引发了激烈的辩论。特别有争议的是,该法案提议对“加重同性恋”行为判处死刑。本研究通过对 2009 年 10 月至 2010 年 6 月期间两份主要日报——政府所有的《新视野报》和私人拥有的《每日监测报》的 176 篇报道进行定量内容分析,并结合对乌干达人权捍卫者的定性访谈,探讨了当地人权倡导者试图影响媒体对该法案的报道的努力,以及这些努力在多大程度上取得了成功。研究发现,尽管两份报纸对该法案的报道频率存在显著差异,但两报都很少有版面用于报道当地人权组织提出的公共卫生和人权问题。尽管乌干达最近在公开应对艾滋病毒/艾滋病方面有着经常受到称赞的历史,但人权组织试图强调该法案对该国有效应对该流行病的能力可能产生的不利影响的努力只是部分成功的,而且有趣的是,这一努力获得的关注比立法可能带来的人权影响要少得多。