Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, N.L., 64849, Mexico.
J Health Econ. 2011 Jul;30(4):707-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.04.003. Epub 2011 May 10.
Many governments have health programs focused on improving health among the poor and these have an impact on out-of-pocket health payments made by individuals. Therefore, one of the objectives of these programs is to reach the poorest and reduce their out-of-pocket expenditure. In this paper we propose the distributional poverty impact approach to measure the poverty impact of out-of-pocket health payments of different health financing policies. This approach is comparable to the impoverishment methodology proposed by Wagstaff and van Doorslaer (2003) that compares poverty indices before and after out-of-pocket health payments. In order to escape the specification of a particular poverty index, we use the marginal dominance approach that uses non-intersecting curves and can rank poverty reducing health financing policies. We present an empirical application of the out-of-pocket health payments for an innovative social financing policy implemented in Mexico named Seguro Popular. The paper finds evidence that Seguro Popular program has a better distributional poverty impact when families face illness when compared to other poverty reducing policies. The empirical dominance approach uses data from Mexico in 2006 and considers international poverty standards of $2 per person per day.
许多政府都有针对贫困人口的健康计划,这些计划对个人的自付医疗费用产生了影响。因此,这些计划的目标之一是覆盖最贫困的人群并降低他们的自付支出。在本文中,我们提出了一种分配贫困影响方法,以衡量不同卫生筹资政策的自付医疗费用对贫困的影响。这种方法类似于 Wagstaff 和 van Doorslaer(2003 年)提出的贫困恶化方法,该方法比较了自付医疗费用前后的贫困指数。为了避免特定贫困指数的规定,我们使用边际优势方法,该方法使用不相交的曲线并可以对减轻贫困的卫生筹资政策进行排名。我们对在墨西哥实施的一项名为 Seguro Popular 的创新社会融资政策的自付医疗费用进行了实证应用。研究结果表明,与其他减贫政策相比,Seguro Popular 计划在家庭面临疾病时具有更好的分配贫困影响。实证优势方法使用了 2006 年墨西哥的数据,并考虑了每人每天 2 美元的国际贫困标准。