Suppr超能文献

在观察单元中,遥测技术在评估胸痛患者方面是否有用?

Is telemetry useful in evaluating chest pain patients in an observation unit?

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, WCC2, One Deaconess Road, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Intern Emerg Med. 2011 Dec;6(6):543-6. doi: 10.1007/s11739-011-0648-x. Epub 2011 Jul 8.

Abstract

Since the development of coronary care units (CCUs), telemetry has rapidly become the standard of care in evaluating patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes, regardless of the probability for ischemia. However, there is no data to support this practice. Our objective was to evaluate the utility of routine cardiac monitoring in a chest pain observation unit. We prospectively studied the utility of routine cardiac monitoring in 249 consecutive patients admitted to an observation unit in an academic Emergency Department over a 6-month period. All the patients presented with chest pain thought to be cardiac ischemia. Observation included serial cardiac enzymes, ECG cardiac monitoring, and exercise testing in a designated chest pain observation unit. These patients were determined to be at low risk for an acute coronary event by two criteria: first, the symptoms had resolved by the time of observation unit admission, and second, the initial ECG was normal, unchanged or non-diagnostic for acute ischemia. Adverse outcomes included cardiac arrest, hospital admission secondary to cardiac dysrhythmia, or alteration in the patient's medical therapy upon discharge from the observation unit, secondary to cardiac dysrhythmia. There were 249 patients included with a median age of 52 with 60% women. Fifteen percent of the patients were, subsequently, admitted to the hospital for further evaluation of ischemia based on enzyme, ECG, and exercise testing results. One patient with known Tachy-Brady syndrome was noted to have 1.5-2 s pauses while sleeping, and discharged with instructions to hold beta blocker therapy pending results of a continuous loop recorder. Of the remaining 248 patients, no patient suffered a cardiac arrest, no patient was admitted to the hospital secondary to cardiac dysrhythmia, and no alteration in a patient's medical therapy was made secondary to cardiac dysrhythmia. No patient returned to the Emergency Department within 72 h with cardiac arrest, acute dysrhythmia or acute myocardial infarction. Although telemetry may be the standard of care in evaluating the patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes, regardless of the probability of an acute ischemic syndrome, in those patients with a normal or non diagnostic ECG and resolved symptoms, routine cardiac monitoring is unnecessary.

摘要

自冠心病监护病房(CCU)发展以来,遥测技术已迅速成为评估疑似急性冠状动脉综合征患者的标准护理方法,无论缺血的可能性如何。然而,目前尚无数据支持这种做法。我们的目的是评估常规心脏监测在胸痛观察单元中的应用价值。我们前瞻性研究了在一个学术急诊部观察单元连续收治的 249 例患者中常规心脏监测的应用价值。所有患者均因胸痛就诊,考虑为心肌缺血。观察包括连续的心脏酶学检查、心电图心脏监测和在指定的胸痛观察单元进行运动试验。这些患者通过以下两个标准被确定为发生急性冠状动脉事件的风险较低:首先,观察单元入院时症状已缓解;其次,初始心电图正常、不变或非急性缺血性改变。不良结局包括心搏骤停、因心律失常而住院、或因心律失常而改变观察单元出院后的患者医疗治疗。共纳入 249 例患者,中位年龄为 52 岁,其中 60%为女性。根据酶学、心电图和运动试验结果,15%的患者随后因缺血被收入院进一步评估。一名患有已知的心动过速-心动过缓综合征的患者在睡眠期间被发现有 1.5-2 秒的停搏,出院时被告知暂停β受体阻滞剂治疗,等待连续环录仪的结果。在其余 248 例患者中,无患者发生心搏骤停,无患者因心律失常而住院,无患者因心律失常而改变其医疗治疗。无患者在 72 小时内因心搏骤停、急性心律失常或急性心肌梗死返回急诊科。尽管遥测技术可能是评估疑似急性冠状动脉综合征患者的标准护理方法,无论急性缺血综合征的可能性如何,但对于心电图正常或非诊断性且症状已缓解的患者,常规心脏监测是不必要的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验