Servizio di Radiologia, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Milano, Italy.
Radiol Med. 2012 Feb;117(1):85-95. doi: 10.1007/s11547-011-0706-5. Epub 2011 Jul 9.
The purpose of our study was to demonstrate the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) when measuring and characterising periprosthetic fluid collections in patients with painful hip prosthesis and to provide an estimation of interobserver reproducibility.
Nineteen patients (mean age 59±13 years) with painful total hip replacement and clinical suspicion of infection underwent MRI. Images were reviewed blindly by two musculoskeletal radiologists with different levels of experience who evaluated the presence/absence of soft tissue oedema or fluid collection (when present, three-plane maximal diameters were measured; involvement of skin/subcutaneous/deep tissues or prosthesis were estimated; fluid was classified as serous/purulent/haematic according to signal behaviour). Interobserver agreement was calculated (Cohen's ).
A total of 26 MRI studies were carried out (three patients underwent two and two patients underwent three MRI examinations). Both readers detected soft tissue oedema (13/26, 50%) or fluid collection (21/26, 81%) and characterised the fluid as serous (9/21, 43%), purulent (8/21, 38%) or haematic (4/21, 19%). The collection involved skin/subcutaneous tissues (16/21, 76%), deep soft tissues (19/21, 91%) or the implant (12/21, 57%). For all evaluations, interobserver agreement was complete (=1). No significant differences were found between the measurements of the collections (p>0.258).
MRI is highly reproducible in detection, localisation, quantification, and characterisation of fluid collections when the presence of implant infection is clinically suspected.
本研究旨在展示磁共振成像(MRI)在测量和描述有症状髋关节假体患者的假体周围积液中的诊断价值,并评估观察者间的可重复性。
19 例(平均年龄 59±13 岁)有症状的全髋关节置换术后且临床怀疑感染的患者接受了 MRI 检查。两名不同经验水平的肌肉骨骼放射科医生对图像进行了盲法评估,评估内容包括软组织水肿或积液的存在/不存在(当存在时,测量三平面最大直径;评估皮肤/皮下/深部组织或假体的受累情况;根据信号特征将液体分类为浆液性/脓性/血性)。计算了观察者间的一致性(Cohen's )。
共进行了 26 项 MRI 研究(3 例患者进行了 2 次检查,2 例患者进行了 3 次检查)。两位读者均检测到软组织水肿(13/26,50%)或积液(21/26,81%),并将液体特征描述为浆液性(9/21,43%)、脓性(8/21,38%)或血性(4/21,19%)。积液累及皮肤/皮下组织(16/21,76%)、深部软组织(19/21,91%)或假体(12/21,57%)。对于所有评估,观察者间的一致性均为完全一致(=1)。未发现测量积液之间存在显著差异(p>0.258)。
当临床上怀疑假体感染时,MRI 在检测、定位、定量和描述积液方面具有高度的可重复性。