Department of Genetics and Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Trends Genet. 2011 Sep;27(9):343-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
The abundance of genome polymorphism and divergence data has provided unprecedented insight into how mutation, drift and natural selection shape genome evolution. Application of the McDonald-Kreitman (MK) test to such data indicates a pervasive influence of positive selection, particularly in Drosophila species. However, evidence for positive selection in other species ranging from yeast to humans is often weak or absent. Although evidence for positive selection could be obscured in some species, there is also reason to believe that the frequency of adaptive substitutions could be overestimated as a result of epistatic fitness effects or hitchhiking of deleterious mutations. Based on these considerations it is argued that the common assumption of independence among sites must be relaxed before abandoning the neutral theory of molecular evolution.
基因组多态性和分化数据的大量出现,为研究突变、漂变和自然选择如何塑造基因组进化提供了前所未有的视角。将 McDonald-Kreitman(MK)检验应用于此类数据表明,正选择具有普遍影响,尤其是在果蝇物种中。然而,在从酵母到人类等其他物种中,正选择的证据往往较弱或不存在。尽管在某些物种中,正选择的证据可能被掩盖,但也有理由认为,由于上位性适合度效应或有害突变的 hitchhiking,适应性替代的频率可能被高估。基于这些考虑,有人认为,在放弃分子进化的中性理论之前,必须放松对位点之间独立性的常见假设。