Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 Jul-Aug;18(4):494-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.04.003.
To determine whether economy of instrument movement can differentiate between skills levels during intracorporeal suturing using a box trainer model.
Prospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
Skills laboratory of a university teaching hospital.
Forty-two volunteers participated including 19 medical students without previous laparoscopic experience (novices), 12 residents in obstetrics and gynecology (intermediates), and 11 practitioners of intracorporeal suturing who had performed at least 200 laparoscopic procedures including advanced surgery (experts).
Each participant performed 3 consecutive standardized intracorporeal sutures using a box trainer, and instrument movements were recorded using the TrEndo tracking device.
Time, path length, motion in depth, and motion smoothness of the instrument tips were recorded. Performance in the 3 groups differed significantly (p <.001 for all parameters; Kruskal-Wallis test). Experts outperformed novices in all 4 parameters (p <.01; Bonferroni test).
The construct validity has been suggested for time, path length, motion in depth, and motion smoothness for assessment of the laparoscopic suturing task using a box trainer. An expert level has been set for training and assessment purposes. The addition of economy of movement to time to complete the task has the potential to refine acquisition of skills.
使用盒式训练器模型确定器械运动的经济性是否可以区分腔内缝合技能水平。
前瞻性队列研究(加拿大任务组分类 II-2)。
大学教学医院的技能实验室。
42 名志愿者参加,包括 19 名无先前腹腔镜经验的医学生(新手)、12 名妇产科住院医师(中级)和 11 名至少进行了 200 例包括高级手术在内的腔内缝合术的从业者(专家)。
每位参与者使用盒式训练器连续进行 3 次标准化的腔内缝合,使用 TrEndo 跟踪装置记录器械运动。
记录了器械尖端的时间、路径长度、深度运动和运动平稳度。3 组的表现差异显著(所有参数 p <.001;Kruskal-Wallis 检验)。专家在所有 4 个参数上的表现均优于新手(p <.01;Bonferroni 检验)。
使用盒式训练器评估腹腔镜缝合任务时,时间、路径长度、深度运动和运动平稳度的构建效度已经得到了验证。已经为培训和评估目的设定了专家水平。将运动经济性添加到完成任务的时间中,有可能使技能的获得更加精细化。