Department of Health Policy and Management, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Aug;30(8):1585-93. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0196. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
Public health encompasses a broad array of programs designed to prevent the occurrence of disease and injury within communities. But policy makers have little evidence to draw on when determining the value of investments in these program activities, which currently account for less than 5 percent of US health spending. We examine whether changes in spending by local public health agencies over a thirteen-year period contributed to changes in rates of community mortality from preventable causes of death, including infant mortality and deaths due to cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and cancer. We found that mortality rates fell between 1.1 percent and 6.9 percent for each 10 percent increase in local public health spending. These results suggest that increased public health investments can produce measurable improvements in health, especially in low-resource communities. However, more money by itself is unlikely to generate significant and sustainable health gains; improvements in public health practices are needed as well.
公共卫生涵盖了广泛的项目,旨在预防社区内疾病和伤害的发生。但是,政策制定者在确定对这些项目活动投资的价值时几乎没有证据可依据,而这些项目活动目前仅占美国卫生支出的不到 5%。我们研究了在 13 年期间,地方公共卫生机构支出的变化是否有助于降低可预防的死亡原因(包括婴儿死亡率和心血管疾病、糖尿病和癌症导致的死亡)的社区死亡率。我们发现,地方公共卫生支出每增加 10%,死亡率就会下降 1.1%至 6.9%。这些结果表明,增加公共卫生投资可以带来可衡量的健康改善,尤其是在资源匮乏的社区。然而,仅仅增加资金本身不太可能带来显著和可持续的健康收益;还需要改进公共卫生实践。