Suppr超能文献

开放腹部手术中 PerfecTemp 与强制空气加热的随机比较。

A randomized comparison of intraoperative PerfecTemp and forced-air warming during open abdominal surgery.

机构信息

Department of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue/P77, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2011 Nov;113(5):1076-81. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822b896d. Epub 2011 Aug 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The PerfecTemp is an underbody resistive warming system that combines servocontrolled underbody warming with viscoelastic foam pressure relief. Clinical efficacy of the system has yet to be formally evaluated. We therefore tested the hypothesis that intraoperative distal esophageal (core) temperatures with the PerfecTemp (underbody resistive) warming system are noninferior to upper-body forced-air warming in patients undergoing major open abdominal surgery under general anesthesia.

METHODS

Adults scheduled for elective major open abdominal surgery (liver, pancreas, gynecological, and colorectal surgery) under general anesthesia were enrolled at 2 centers. Patients were randomly assigned to underbody resistive or forced-air warming. Resistive heating started when patients were transferred to the operating room table; forced-air warming started after patients were draped. The primary outcome was noninferiority of intraoperative time-weighted average core temperature, adjusted for baseline characteristics and using a buffer of 0.5°C.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to underbody resistive heating and 34 to forced-air warming. Baseline and surgical characteristics were generally similar. We had sufficient evidence (P=0.018) to conclude that underbody resistive warming is not worse than (i.e., noninferior to) upper-body forced-air warming in the time-weighted average intraoperative temperature, with a mean difference of -0.12°C [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.37 to 0.14]. Core temperatures at the end of surgery averaged 36.3°C [95% CI 36 to 36.5] in the resistive warming patients and 36.6°C [95% CI 36.4 to 36.8] in those assigned to forced-air warming for a mean difference of -0.34°C [95% CI -0.69 to 0.01].

CONCLUSIONS

Mean intraoperative time-weighted average core temperatures were no different, and significantly noninferior, with underbody resistive heating in comparison with upper-body forced-air warming. Underbody resistive heating may be an alternative to forced-air warming.

摘要

背景

PerfecTemp 是一种底盘电阻式加热系统,它将伺服控制的底盘加热与粘弹性泡沫压力缓解相结合。该系统的临床疗效尚未经过正式评估。因此,我们测试了这样一个假设,即在全身麻醉下接受大型开腹手术的患者中,使用 PerfecTemp(底盘电阻式)加热系统进行术中远端食管(核心)温度与上半身强制空气加热相比是非劣效的。

方法

在两个中心招募了计划在全身麻醉下接受择期大型开腹手术(肝脏、胰腺、妇科和结直肠手术)的成年人。患者被随机分配到底盘电阻或强制空气加热。当患者转移到手术台时开始进行电阻加热;当患者被覆盖时开始进行强制空气加热。主要结局是调整基线特征和使用 0.5°C 缓冲区后,术中时间加权平均核心温度的非劣效性。

结果

36 名患者被随机分配到底盘电阻加热组,34 名患者被分配到强制空气加热组。基线和手术特征通常相似。我们有足够的证据(P=0.018)得出结论,底盘电阻加热在时间加权平均术中温度方面并不比(即非劣效于)上半身强制空气加热差,平均差异为-0.12°C[95%置信区间(CI)-0.37 至 0.14]。在电阻加热患者中,手术结束时的核心温度平均为 36.3°C[95%CI 36 至 36.5],在分配到强制空气加热的患者中为 36.6°C[95%CI 36.4 至 36.8],平均差异为-0.34°C[95%CI-0.69 至 0.01]。

结论

与上半身强制空气加热相比,底盘电阻加热的术中时间加权平均核心温度没有差异,且明显非劣效。底盘电阻加热可能是强制空气加热的替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验