Department of Pediatrics, Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, OH 45229-3039, USA.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2012 Jan;38(1):93-100. doi: 10.3109/00952990.2011.600395. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
Little is known about the relationship between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) subtypes and substance-use disorder (SUD). As there is literature suggesting different subtype phenotypes, there may be subtype differences in regard to the risk for developing SUD and substance treatment response.
To characterize the sample in a Clinical Trials Network (CTN) study according to ADHD subtypes and baseline psychosocial and substance-use characteristics and to compare subtypes on response to treatment.
Secondary analyses on data collected from adolescents (n = 276) diagnosed with ADHD and SUD (non-nicotine) and treated with stimulant medication or placebo and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for substance use. Participants were characterized as inattentive or combined ADHD subtype and compared on baseline characteristics and treatment outcome.
The combined subtype presented with more severe SUDs and higher rates of conduct disorder. There were a greater proportion of boys with inattentive subtype. The inattentive subtype appeared less ready for treatment (greater University of Rhode Island Change Assessment precontemplation scores) with poorer coping skills (poorer problem-solving and abstinence focused coping) at baseline. However, the two subtypes responded equally to treatment even after controlling for baseline differences.
Findings from this large community sample indicate that there were no subtype differences in treatment response, although there were differences in terms of substance use, antisocial behavior, readiness for treatment, and gender prior to treatment.
This study is the first to report on subtype differences for treatment response for non-nicotine SUD in a comorbid ADHD-SUD population. Despite some baseline differences, both subtypes responded equally to treatment, suggesting limited relevance for subtype designation on treatment planning.
人们对注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)亚型与物质使用障碍(SUD)之间的关系知之甚少。由于有文献表明存在不同的亚型表型,因此在发生 SUD 的风险和物质治疗反应方面可能存在亚型差异。
根据 ADHD 亚型以及基线心理社会和物质使用特征对临床试验网络(CTN)研究中的样本进行特征描述,并比较不同亚型对治疗反应的差异。
对诊断为 ADHD 和 SUD(非尼古丁)并接受兴奋剂药物或安慰剂和认知行为治疗(CBT)治疗物质使用的青少年(n = 276)的 CTN 研究数据进行二次分析。根据 ADHD 亚型将参与者分为注意力不集中型或混合型,并对基线特征和治疗结果进行比较。
混合型表现出更严重的 SUD 和更高的品行障碍发生率。注意力不集中型的男孩比例更高。注意力不集中型似乎不太准备接受治疗(更倾向于罗得岛大学改变评估量表中的前沉思阶段),基线时应对技能较差(解决问题和专注于禁欲的应对技能较差)。但是,即使在控制了基线差异后,两种亚型对治疗的反应仍然相同。
来自该大型社区样本的研究结果表明,在治疗反应方面,两种亚型没有差异,尽管在治疗前存在物质使用、反社会行为、治疗准备和性别方面的差异。
本研究首次报告了 ADHD-SUD 共病人群中非尼古丁 SUD 的治疗反应的亚型差异。尽管存在一些基线差异,但两种亚型对治疗的反应相同,这表明在治疗计划中,亚型分类的相关性有限。