Division of Cardiology, Electrophysiology Section, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco California, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 16;58(8):831-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.05.017.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether electrocardiographic characteristics of ventricular arrhythmias distinguish patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) from those with right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia (RVOT-VT).
Ventricular arrhythmias in RVOT-VT and ARVD/C-VT patients can share a left bundle branch block/inferior axis morphology.
We compared the electrocardiographic morphology of ventricular tachycardia or premature ventricular contractions with left bundle branch block/inferior axis pattern in 16 ARVD/C patients with that in 42 RVOT-VT patients.
ARVD/C patients had a significantly longer mean QRS duration in lead I (150 ± 31 ms vs. 123 ± 34 ms, p = 0.006), more often exhibited a precordial transition in lead V(6) (3 of 17 [18%] vs. 0 of 42 [0%] with RVOT-VT, p = 0.005), and more often had at least 1 lead with notching (11 of 17 [65%] vs. 9 of 42 [21%], p = 0.001). The most sensitive characteristics for the detection of ARVD/C were a QRS duration in lead I of ≥120 ms (88% sensitivity, 91% negative predictive value). QRS transition at V(6) was most specific at 100% (100% positive predictive value, 77% negative predictive value). The presence of notching on any QRS complex had 79% sensitivity and 65% specificity of (55% positive predictive value, 85% negative predictive value). In multivariate analysis, QRS duration in lead I of ≥120 ms (odds ratio [OR]: 20.4, p = 0.034), earliest onset QRS in lead V(1) (OR: 17.0, p = 0.022), QRS notching (OR: 7.7, p = 0.018), and a transition of V(5) or later (OR: 7.0, p = 0.030) each predicted the presence of ARVD/C.
Several electrocardiographic criteria can help distinguish right ventricular outflow tract arrhythmias originating from ARVD/C compared with RVOT-VT patients.
本研究旨在评估室性心律失常的心电图特征是否能区分致心律失常性右室心肌病(ARVD/C)与右室流出道室性心动过速(RVOT-VT)患者。
RVOT-VT 和 ARVD/C-VT 患者的室性心律失常可能具有左束支传导阻滞/下壁形态。
我们比较了 16 例 ARVD/C 患者和 42 例 RVOT-VT 患者具有左束支传导阻滞/下壁形态的室性心动过速或室性期前收缩的心电图形态。
ARVD/C 患者 I 导联的平均 QRS 持续时间明显较长(150±31 ms 比 123±34 ms,p=0.006),V6 导联更常出现胸前导联过渡(17 例中的 3 例[18%]比 42 例中的 0 例[0%],p=0.005),且更常出现至少 1 个导联切迹(17 例中的 11 例[65%]比 42 例中的 9 例[21%],p=0.001)。检测 ARVD/C 的最敏感特征是 I 导联的 QRS 持续时间≥120 ms(88%的敏感性,91%的阴性预测值)。V6 导联的 QRS 过渡特异性最高,为 100%(100%的阳性预测值,77%的阴性预测值)。任何 QRS 综合波上出现切迹的敏感性为 79%,特异性为 65%(55%的阳性预测值,85%的阴性预测值)。多变量分析显示,I 导联的 QRS 持续时间≥120 ms(优势比[OR]:20.4,p=0.034)、V1 导联最早出现 QRS(OR:17.0,p=0.022)、QRS 切迹(OR:7.7,p=0.018)和 V5 或更晚的过渡(OR:7.0,p=0.030)均预测 ARVD/C 的存在。
与 RVOT-VT 患者相比,几种心电图标准可有助于区分源自 ARVD/C 的右室流出道心律失常。