Department of Colorectal Surgery, Torbay Hospital, Lawes Bridge, Torquay TQ2 7AA, UK.
Surgeon. 2011 Oct;9(5):259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2010.10.003. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
Enhanced Recovery Programmes (ERPs) have been shown to benefit recovery following major surgery in selected centres and patient groups, but their wider applicability requires continued evaluation. The aims of this study were to assess the outcomes of the first 400 consecutive, non-selected patients, undergoing major elective colorectal surgery within an Enhanced Recovery programme at a UK District General hospital and to examine the effects of patient risk factors and operative approach on outcomes.
Since September 2005 all patients undergoing major elective colon and rectal surgery at our hospital have been treated within an ERP and their data recorded prospectively on a database. Safety and efficacy outcomes for the first 400 patients were compared using SPSS v14.0 with both a retrospective, pre-ERP group; and according to patient risk factors and operative approaches.
Median length of stays (LOS) reduced from 9 days (IQR 7-11) to 6 days (IQR 5-10) after introduction of the ERP (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences in LOS were observed between elderly (≥80 years) and younger patients or between different BMI groups. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade 3 patients demonstrated significantly longer median LOS than those with ASA grades 1 and 2. Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery had median LOS of 6 days (IQR 4-8) compared to 7 days (IQR 5-10) for open procedures (p < 0.001). No differences in morbidity or mortality were observed between the groups.
Unselected application of an ERP in our unit has been associated with reductions in post-operative LOS. The ERP was safe and effective when applied to all our study patients independent of age and BMI. Despite LOS being longer in ASA grade 3 patients, application of the ERP to this higher risk group was not associated with significantly increased morbidity or mortality. Laparoscopic surgery resulted in additional modest reductions in LOS compared to open surgery within the ERP.
在选定的中心和患者群体中,增强康复计划(ERPs)已被证明有利于大手术后的恢复,但它们的更广泛适用性需要持续评估。本研究的目的是评估在英国地区综合医院的增强康复计划下接受大择期结直肠手术的前 400 例连续非选择性患者的结果,并检查患者风险因素和手术方法对结果的影响。
自 2005 年 9 月以来,我院所有接受大择期结肠和直肠手术的患者均在 ERP 中接受治疗,并在数据库中前瞻性记录其数据。使用 SPSS v14.0 对前 400 例患者的安全性和疗效结果进行比较,包括回顾性 ERP 前组和根据患者风险因素和手术方法分组。
引入 ERP 后,中位住院时间(LOS)从 9 天(IQR 7-11)缩短至 6 天(IQR 5-10)(p<0.001)。在老年(≥80 岁)和年轻患者之间或不同 BMI 组之间,LOS 无统计学差异。美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级 3 级患者的中位 LOS 明显长于 ASA 分级 1 级和 2 级患者。与开放手术相比,腹腔镜手术患者的中位 LOS 为 6 天(IQR 4-8),而开放手术为 7 天(IQR 5-10)(p<0.001)。各组之间的发病率或死亡率无差异。
在我们的单位中,ERP 的非选择性应用与术后 LOS 减少有关。当应用于我们所有研究患者时,ERP 是安全有效的,与年龄和 BMI 无关。尽管 ASA 分级 3 级患者的 LOS 较长,但将 ERP 应用于该高风险组与发病率或死亡率的显著增加无关。在 ERP 中,腹腔镜手术与开放手术相比,LOS 略有进一步降低。