Suppr超能文献

12 个月龄与阶段问卷精细运动区域在重大手术后婴儿中的有效性。

Validity of the fine motor area of the 12-month ages and stages questionnaire in infants following major surgery.

机构信息

Lifestart Early Childhood Intervention Services, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2012 Aug;32(3):260-71. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2011.606261. Epub 2011 Aug 23.

Abstract

The Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) are parent-report screening tools to identify infants at risk of developmental difficulties. The purpose of this study was to examine validity and internal reliability of the fine motor developmental area of the ASQ, 2nd edition (ASQ2-FM) for screening 12-month-old infants following major surgery. The ASQ2-FM was completed by caregivers of 74 infants who had cardiac surgery in the first 90 days of life, 104 infants who had noncardiac surgery in the first 90 days of life, and a control group of 154 infants. The Rasch item response analysis revealed that the ASQ2-FM had poor ability to discriminate among levels of fine motor ability. Sensitivity was poor (20%) and specificity was good (98%) when compared with the scores for the fine motor subscale of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. The ASQ2-FM under-identified infants at risk for fine motor delay; internal reliability and construct validity do not support use as a screening tool of fine motor development of infants aged 12 months who have undergone major surgery.

摘要

《年龄与阶段问卷》(ASQ)是一种家长报告式的筛查工具,用于识别有发育困难风险的婴儿。本研究旨在检验适用于筛查术后 12 个月婴儿的 ASQ 第二版精细运动发育领域(ASQ2-FM)的有效性和内部可靠性。该问卷由 74 名在生命的前 90 天内接受心脏手术的婴儿、104 名在生命的前 90 天内接受非心脏手术的婴儿和 154 名对照组婴儿的照顾者完成。Rasch 项目反应分析显示,ASQ2-FM 在精细运动能力水平上的区分能力较差。与贝利婴幼儿发育量表精细运动分量表的评分相比,其敏感性较低(20%),特异性较高(98%)。ASQ2-FM 未能识别出有精细运动发育迟缓风险的婴儿;内部可靠性和结构效度不支持将其用作已接受重大手术的 12 个月大婴儿精细运动发育的筛查工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验