Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3 Suppl):50S-4S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.05.110.
Conflicts of interest exist when an arrangement potentially exerts inappropriate influence on decision making or professional judgment, or is perceived to do so, and can thus damage the public trust and undermine the integrity of those decisions. Concerns regarding financial conflicts of interest in the medical arena have reached their height as of late, given that physicians now function in a milieu of complex and delicate relationships with pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device industries. Even when such relationships do not correlate with actual compromise of judgment or patient care, it threatens the credibility of both the health care professional and the institution because of the social perception of the effect of these relationships. Although most institutions in the Western world set forth a code of ethics and conflict-of-interest policies to be followed under threat of termination, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) presents itself as a unique environment in which conflicts of interest are subject to governmental laws, violation of which may not only result in employment-related discipline, but may be sanctioned by civil and criminal penalties. Moreover, these provisions are developed by a national authoritative organization rather than being institution-specific guidelines. Given that many academic physicians working within the VHA may also have a component of their practice in a University setting, it becomes important to understand the differences in policy between these contexts so as not to threaten the public trust in the veracity of decisions made and, therefore, maintain the integrity of the relationship between physician and patient. This article will review aspects of conflict-of-interest policies in the realm of research, financial relationships, foreign travel, and vendor contracting that are particular to the VHA and make it a unique environment to function in as a physician and scientist.
当一种安排可能对决策或专业判断产生不当影响,或者被认为会产生这种影响时,就存在利益冲突,从而损害公众信任,破坏这些决策的完整性。由于医生现在与制药、生物技术和医疗器械行业之间的关系复杂而微妙,因此,最近人们对医疗领域的财务利益冲突的担忧达到了前所未有的高度。即使这些关系与实际判断或患者护理的妥协无关,也会因为公众对这些关系的影响的看法而威胁到医疗保健专业人员和医疗机构的信誉。尽管西方世界的大多数机构都制定了道德准则和利益冲突政策,如果违反这些政策,将面临被解雇的威胁,但退伍军人健康管理局 (VHA) 本身就是一个独特的环境,其中利益冲突受政府法律的约束,违反这些法律不仅可能导致与就业相关的纪律处分,还可能受到民事和刑事处罚。此外,这些规定是由一个国家权威组织制定的,而不是针对特定机构的准则。鉴于许多在 VHA 工作的学术医生的实践也可能有一部分在大学环境中,因此了解这些背景下政策的差异非常重要,以免威胁到公众对所做决策真实性的信任,从而维护医患关系的完整性。本文将审查与研究、财务关系、境外旅行和供应商合同有关的利益冲突政策方面,这些方面是 VHA 特有的,并使其成为医生和科学家的独特工作环境。