The Cheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, Faculty of Social Welfare & Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Israel.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2011 Sep-Oct;38(5):559-64. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e31822b3292.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence of in-hospital incontinence brief use among older patients who did not use diapers prior to admission. A second aim was to identify factors affecting the use of incontinence briefs, commodes, urinals, and self-toileting.
The study was conducted in 5 medical acute-care units of a 900-bed teaching hospital in Israel. The data presented here were collected from a total of 465 patients (age ≥ 70 years) who did not use incontinence briefs prior to admission.
The current study is part of a larger prospective cohort study conducted from February to November 2009. Patients or proxies were interviewed on admission regarding their functional status, mobility, continence status, and type of voiding patterns prior to hospital stay. Interviews regarding in-hospital voiding and mobility patterns were conducted each day after the first 48 hours of hospitalization. Electronic medical records were extracted to calculate the severity of illness, comorbidity score, and length of hospital stay.
The incidence of in-hospital adult incontinence brief use was 14% (65/465), whereas the rate of in-hospital commodes/urinals was 8.2% (38/465). The relative risk (RR) of incontinence brief use versus self-toileting was 18.76 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 4.36-43.72) and 10.12 (95% CI: 2.23-13.48) higher for patients with low or moderate in-hospital mobility, respectively, versus those who were highly mobile. Patients who used incontinence briefs were more likely to be female (RR = 1.65; CI: 1.20-2.23) and were more likely to have low mobility (RR = 1.59; 95% CI: 1.10-2.35) than patients who used commodes/urinals.
Adult incontinence briefs are frequently used in continent patients, especially women, with low mobility. However, the current literature identifies incontinence briefs use as leading to multiple adverse outcomes. Therefore, the use of adult incontinence briefs among hospitalized older adults requires more scrutiny.
本研究旨在评估在入院前未使用尿布的老年患者住院期间失禁垫的使用发生率。第二个目的是确定影响失禁垫、便盆、尿壶和自我如厕使用的因素。
本研究在以色列一家 900 张床位教学医院的 5 个内科急性护理病房进行。此处呈现的数据来自总共 465 名(年龄≥70 岁)入院前未使用失禁垫的患者。
本研究是一项更大的前瞻性队列研究的一部分,该研究于 2009 年 2 月至 11 月进行。在入院时,患者或其代理人会接受关于其功能状态、活动能力、失禁状态和入院前排尿模式类型的访谈。在入院后头 48 小时后的每天进行关于住院期间排尿和活动模式的访谈。提取电子病历以计算疾病严重程度、合并症评分和住院时间。
住院期间成人失禁垫使用率为 14%(65/465),而住院期间便盆/尿壶使用率为 8.2%(38/465)。与能够高度自理的患者相比,活动能力低或中度的患者使用失禁垫的相对风险(RR)分别高出 18.76(95%置信区间 [CI]:4.36-43.72)和 10.12(95% CI:2.23-13.48),用于失禁垫。使用失禁垫的患者更有可能是女性(RR=1.65;CI:1.20-2.23),且更有可能活动能力较低(RR=1.59;95% CI:1.10-2.35),而不是使用便盆/尿壶的患者。
成人失禁垫经常被活动能力低的女性失禁患者使用。然而,目前的文献表明,失禁垫的使用会导致多种不良后果。因此,需要更仔细地审查住院老年患者使用成人失禁垫的情况。