Suppr超能文献

利益冲突的伦理管理:学术外科协会的标准建议。

Ethical management of conflict of interest: proposed standards for academic surgical societies.

机构信息

University of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Nov;213(5):677-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.08.003. Epub 2011 Aug 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A significant increase in industry support of professional medical associations coupled with data suggesting that gifts from industry have significant clinical influence have prompted calls from the Institute of Medicine and physician leaders to identify and manage conflicts of interest that stem from financial support of professional medical associations by industry.

STUDY DESIGN

A joint task force of members appointed by the Association for Academic Surgery and the Society of University Surgeons was convened in July 2009. Recommendations were developed regarding management of all potential conflicts of interest that can arise within the context of an academic surgical society, with specific focus on relationships with industry. Task force members reached consensus around each recommendation and the guidelines were subsequently adopted by the Executive Councils of both societies.

RESULTS

The committee identified 4 primary areas of need for transparent and definitive management of conflict of interest: 1) individual society activities, including general budget support, society endorsements, and journal affiliation; 2) individual personnel conflicts such as society leadership and standards for disclosure of conflict; 3) meeting activities including budgetary support, program committee associations, and abstract review process; and 4) foundation support and research and travel awards. The resulting guidelines aim to protect the societies and their membership from undue bias that may undermine the credibility and mission of these associations.

CONCLUSIONS

Policy guidelines to mitigate conflict of interest are necessary to protect the integrity of the work of academic surgical societies and their fiduciary duty to members and patients. Guidelines created and adopted by the Association for Academic Surgery and Society of University Surgeons form an effective model for academic surgical societies and their members.

摘要

背景

工业界对专业医学协会的支持显著增加,同时有数据表明,来自工业界的礼物对临床有重大影响,这促使美国国家科学院医学研究所和医师领袖呼吁识别和管理因工业界对专业医学协会的财务支持而产生的利益冲突。

研究设计

一个由外科医师学会协会和大学外科医生学会任命的联合特别工作组于 2009 年 7 月召开会议。会议就管理学术外科协会背景下可能出现的所有潜在利益冲突提出了建议,特别关注与工业界的关系。特别工作组的成员就每项建议达成了共识,随后两个协会的执行委员会通过了这些准则。

结果

委员会确定了需要透明和明确管理利益冲突的 4 个主要领域:1)单个协会的活动,包括一般预算支持、协会认可和期刊联系;2)个人人员冲突,如协会领导和披露冲突的标准;3)会议活动,包括预算支持、计划委员会的关联和摘要审查程序;4)基金会支持和研究及旅行奖。由此产生的准则旨在保护协会及其成员免受可能破坏这些协会信誉和使命的不当偏见。

结论

制定和实施政策准则以减轻利益冲突是保护学术外科协会工作完整性及其对成员和患者的信托责任所必需的。外科医师学会协会和大学外科医生学会制定并通过的准则为学术外科协会及其成员提供了一个有效的模式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验