School of Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QB, UK.
Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 16;59(2):1524-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.033. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
Whether people with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASDs) have a specific deficit when processing biological motion has been a topic of much debate. We used psychophysical methods to determine individual behavioural thresholds in a point-light direction discrimination paradigm for a small but carefully matched groups of adults (N=10 per group) with and without ASDs. These thresholds were used to derive individual stimulus levels in an identical fMRI task, with the purpose of equalising task performance across all participants whilst inside the scanner. The results of this investigation show that despite comparable behavioural performance both inside and outside the scanner, the group with ASDs shows a different pattern of BOLD activation from the TD group in response to the same stimulus levels. Furthermore, connectivity analysis suggests that the main differences between the groups are that the TD group utilise a unitary network with information passing from temporal to parietal regions, whilst the ASD group utilise two distinct networks; one utilising motion sensitive areas and another utilising form selective areas. Furthermore, a temporal-parietal link that is present in the TD group is missing in the ASD group. We tentatively propose that these differences may occur due to early dysfunctional connectivity in the brains of people with ASDs, which to some extent is compensated for by rewiring in high functioning adults.
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者在处理生物运动时是否存在特定缺陷一直是一个备受争议的话题。我们使用心理物理学方法来确定具有和不具有 ASD 的成年人(每组 10 人)在一个小而精心匹配的群体中在点光方向辨别范式中的个体行为阈值。这些阈值用于在相同的 fMRI 任务中得出个体刺激水平,目的是在扫描室内使所有参与者的任务表现均等。该研究的结果表明,尽管在扫描室内和室外的行为表现相当,但 ASD 组在对相同刺激水平的反应中表现出与 TD 组不同的 BOLD 激活模式。此外,连接分析表明,两组之间的主要区别在于,TD 组使用从颞叶到顶叶区域传递信息的单一网络,而 ASD 组使用两个不同的网络;一个利用运动敏感区域,另一个利用形态选择性区域。此外,在 TD 组中存在的颞顶叶连接在 ASD 组中缺失。我们推测这些差异可能是由于 ASD 患者大脑中早期的功能连接异常引起的,而在高功能成年人中,这种异常在一定程度上得到了重新布线的补偿。