Department of Haematology, Hpital Andr Mignot, Versailles, France.
Drugs Aging. 2011 Sep 1;28(9):749-64. doi: 10.2165/11592850-000000000-00000.
The main characteristic of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in the elderly is its dismal prognosis. However, other than a lower incidence of T-cell ALL and a greater likelihood of unfavourable chromosomal abnormalities, the clinical and biological characteristics of Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-) ALL in the elderly at diagnosis are no different from those observed in younger adults, and do not account, per se, for its poor prognosis. Rather, the latter is explained to a large extent by a high rate of treatment-induced mortality and/or by the use of less toxic but comparatively less effective drug regimens. Ph- ALL patients are offered treatments ranging from palliative care to intensive chemotherapy, but the survival of patients given palliative or minimally active chemotherapy is extremely poor. However, a valid comparison with patients given more intensive chemotherapy is lacking, as, in most cases, minimally active chemotherapy is used in patients with poor performance status at diagnosis. When more intensive chemotherapy is used, unacceptably high early mortality rates (up to 50%) have been reported, with complete-response rates ranging from 40% to 80% and 5-year survival consistently below 20%. Clearly, the results of therapy are unsatisfactory in Ph- ALL patients, which should encourage the development of innovative approaches, such as the use of new monoclonal antibodies. On the other hand, the availability of imatinib and second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has improved the prognosis of Philadelphia-positive (Ph+) ALL in older patients. Impressive response rates have been reported, even in patients given imatinib and corticosteroids without additional chemotherapy, at the cost of manageable toxicity. Paradoxically, in the imatinib era, elderly patients with Ph+ leukaemia (which is clearly associated with an adverse prognosis in younger adults) seem to survive longer than Ph- elderly patients, although long-term survivors still remain relatively few. Whether new TKIs, such as dasatinib or nilotinib, will improve the prognosis of Ph+ ALL in the elderly is being prospectively assessed in several countries.
急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)在老年人中的主要特征是预后不良。然而,除了 T 细胞 ALL 的发病率较低和更有可能出现不良染色体异常外,诊断时费城染色体阴性(Ph-)ALL 在老年人中的临床和生物学特征与年轻成人观察到的并无不同,并且其本身并不能说明其预后不良。相反,后者在很大程度上是由于治疗相关死亡率高和/或使用毒性较小但相对效果较差的药物方案所致。Ph-ALL 患者接受的治疗范围从姑息治疗到强化化疗,但接受姑息或最小活性化疗的患者的生存极其差。然而,由于在大多数情况下,最小活性化疗仅用于诊断时一般状况较差的患者,因此缺乏与接受更强化化疗的患者的有效比较。当使用更强化化疗时,报告的早期死亡率高得不可接受(高达 50%),完全缓解率为 40%至 80%,5 年生存率始终低于 20%。显然,Ph-ALL 患者的治疗结果并不令人满意,这应该鼓励开发创新方法,例如使用新的单克隆抗体。另一方面,伊马替尼和第二代酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)的出现改善了老年 Ph+ALL 患者的预后。即使在未接受额外化疗的情况下,接受伊马替尼和皮质类固醇的患者也报告了令人印象深刻的反应率,但其毒性可管理。具有讽刺意味的是,在伊马替尼时代,患有 Ph+白血病的老年患者(在年轻成人中明确与不良预后相关)似乎比 Ph-老年患者存活时间更长,尽管长期存活者仍然相对较少。新型 TKI(如达沙替尼或尼洛替尼)是否会改善老年 Ph+ALL 的预后正在几个国家进行前瞻性评估。