Pinto Corina Maia de Souza, Ferreira José Tarcísio Lima, Matsumoto Mírian Aiko Nakane, Borsatto Maria Cristina, Silva Raquel Assed Bezerra da, Romano Fábio Lourenço
Unifal - Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas, MG, Brazil.
Braz Dent J. 2011;22(3):249-53. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402011000300012.
The aim of this study was to assess the influence of different light-emitting diodes (LED) light-curing devices for bonding orthodontic brackets, using the shear bond strength and analysis of adhesive remnant index (ARI). Crowns from 60 bovine incisors received brackets bonded with Transbond XT. Specimens were divided into 4 groups (n=15) according to the light-curing procedures: HL = control, halogen light; OR = Ortholux LED; UL = Ultraled XP, and RD = Radii LED. All light-curing procedures were performed for 40 s. Shear bond strength test was evaluated using an universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test. The ARI scores were evaluated with a stereoscopic magnifying glass and analyzed statistically by Kruskal-Wallis test. A significance level of 5% was set for all analyses. Shear bond strength means in MPa and standard deviations were 9.82 (3.28), 12.70 (3.35), 9.04 (2.80) and 11.22 (2.36) for HL, OR, UL and RD, respectively. OR presented the highest shear bond strength mean value. HL differed significantly (p<0.05) from Groups OR and RD. However, these groups did not differ significantly from each other (p>0.05). Regarding the ARI scores, no statistically significant difference was observed (p>0.05) among the groups. In conclusion, Ortholux LED and Radii LED units provided the highest values of bracket adhesive strength.
本研究的目的是通过剪切粘结强度和粘结剂残留指数(ARI)分析,评估不同发光二极管(LED)光固化设备对正畸托槽粘结的影响。60颗牛切牙的牙冠用Transbond XT粘结托槽。根据光固化程序将标本分为4组(n = 15):HL = 对照组,卤素灯;OR = Ortholux LED;UL = Ultraled XP,以及RD = Radii LED。所有光固化程序均进行40秒。使用万能试验机以0.5 mm/min的十字头速度评估剪切粘结强度测试。数据通过方差分析和Tukey检验进行统计学分析。用立体放大镜评估ARI评分,并通过Kruskal-Wallis检验进行统计学分析。所有分析设定的显著性水平为5%。HL、OR、UL和RD组的剪切粘结强度平均值(以MPa为单位)和标准差分别为9.82(3.28)、12.70(3.35)、9.04(2.80)和11.22(2.36)。OR组的剪切粘结强度平均值最高。HL组与OR组和RD组有显著差异(p<0.05)。然而,这些组之间没有显著差异(p>0.05)。关于ARI评分,各组之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异(p>0.05)。总之,Ortholux LED和Radii LED设备提供了最高的托槽粘结强度值。