Post-Graduation Program in Dentistry, University of Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.
Dent Mater. 2011 Nov;27(11):1119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.08.004. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
To measure the marginal and internal fit of three-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs) using the micro-CT technique, testing the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the adaptation between the ceramic systems studied.
Stainless steel models of prepared abutments were fabricated to design the FPDs. Ten FPDs were produced from each framework ceramic (YZ - Vita In-Ceram YZ and IZ - Vita In-Ceram Zirconia) using CEREC inLab according to the manufacturer instructions. All FPDs were veneered using the recommended porcelain. Each FPD was seated on the original model and scanned using micro-CT. Files were processed using NRecon and CTAn software. Adobe Photoshop and Image J software were used to analyze the cross-sections images. Five measuring locations were used as follows: MG - marginal gap; CA - chamfer area; AW - axial wall; AOT - axio-occlusal transition area; OA - occlusal area. The horizontal marginal discrepancy (HMD) was evaluated in another set of images. Results were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests (α=0.05).
The mean values for MG, CA, AW, OA and HMD were significantly different for all tested groups (p<0.05). IZ exhibited greater mean values than YZ for all measuring locations except for AW and AOT. OA showed the greatest mean gap values for both ceramic systems. MG and AW mean gap values were low for both systems.
The ceramic systems evaluated showed different levels of marginal and internal fit, rejecting the study hypothesis. Yet, both ceramic systems showed clinically acceptable marginal and internal fit.
使用微 CT 技术测量三单位固定局部义齿(FPD)的边缘和内部适合性,检验研究的陶瓷系统之间适应性无差异的零假设。
制作预备基牙的不锈钢模型以设计 FPD。根据制造商的说明,使用 CEREC inLab 从每个框架陶瓷(YZ-Vita In-Ceram YZ 和 IZ-Vita In-Ceram Zirconia)生产 10 个 FPD。使用推荐的瓷对所有 FPD 进行贴面。将每个 FPD 放置在原始模型上,并使用微 CT 进行扫描。使用 NRecon 和 CTAn 软件处理文件。使用 Adobe Photoshop 和 Image J 软件分析横截面图像。使用以下五个测量位置:MG-边缘间隙;CA-倒角区;AW-轴向壁;AOT-轴面-咬合过渡区;OA-咬合区。在另一组图像中评估水平边缘不匹配(HMD)。使用方差分析和 Tukey 检验(α=0.05)对结果进行统计分析。
所有测试组的 MG、CA、AW、OA 和 HMD 的平均值均有显著差异(p<0.05)。除 AW 和 AOT 外,IZ 在所有测量位置的平均值均大于 YZ。OA 显示出两种陶瓷系统的最大平均间隙值。MG 和 AW 的平均间隙值对于两种系统均较低。
评估的陶瓷系统显示出不同程度的边缘和内部适合性,拒绝了研究假设。然而,两种陶瓷系统均显示出临床可接受的边缘和内部适合性。