Kana Rajesh K, Murdaugh Donna L, Libero Lauren E, Pennick Mark R, Wadsworth Heather M, Deshpande Rishi, Hu Christi P
Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
J Vis Exp. 2011 Sep 12(55):3178. doi: 10.3791/3178.
Newly emerging theories suggest that the brain does not function as a cohesive unit in autism, and this discordance is reflected in the behavioral symptoms displayed by individuals with autism. While structural neuroimaging findings have provided some insights into brain abnormalities in autism, the consistency of such findings is questionable. Functional neuroimaging, on the other hand, has been more fruitful in this regard because autism is a disorder of dynamic processing and allows examination of communication between cortical networks, which appears to be where the underlying problem occurs in autism. Functional connectivity is defined as the temporal correlation of spatially separate neurological events. Findings from a number of recent fMRI studies have supported the idea that there is weaker coordination between different parts of the brain that should be working together to accomplish complex social or language problems. One of the mysteries of autism is the coexistence of deficits in several domains along with relatively intact, sometimes enhanced, abilities. Such complex manifestation of autism calls for a global and comprehensive examination of the disorder at the neural level. A compelling recent account of the brain functioning in autism, the cortical underconnectivity theory, provides an integrating framework for the neurobiological bases of autism. The cortical underconnectivity theory of autism suggests that any language, social, or psychological function that is dependent on the integration of multiple brain regions is susceptible to disruption as the processing demand increases. In autism, the underfunctioning of integrative circuitry in the brain may cause widespread underconnectivity. In other words, people with autism may interpret information in a piecemeal fashion at the expense of the whole. Since cortical underconnectivity among brain regions, especially the frontal cortex and more posterior areas, has now been relatively well established, we can begin to further understand brain connectivity as a critical component of autism symptomatology. A logical next step in this direction is to examine the anatomical connections that may mediate the functional connections mentioned above. Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) is a relatively novel neuroimaging technique that helps probe the diffusion of water in the brain to infer the integrity of white matter fibers. In this technique, water diffusion in the brain is examined in several directions using diffusion gradients. While functional connectivity provides information about the synchronization of brain activation across different brain areas during a task or during rest, DTI helps in understanding the underlying axonal organization which may facilitate the cross-talk among brain areas. This paper will describe these techniques as valuable tools in understanding the brain in autism and the challenges involved in this line of research.
新出现的理论表明,在自闭症中大脑并非作为一个凝聚性单元发挥作用,这种不协调反映在自闭症患者所表现出的行为症状中。虽然结构神经影像学研究结果为自闭症中的大脑异常提供了一些见解,但这些结果的一致性值得怀疑。另一方面,功能神经影像学在这方面收获更多,因为自闭症是一种动态加工障碍,能够对皮质网络之间的交流进行检测,而这似乎正是自闭症潜在问题所在之处。功能连接被定义为空间上分离的神经事件的时间相关性。最近一些功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究的结果支持了这样一种观点,即大脑中本应协同工作以完成复杂社交或语言问题的不同部分之间的协调性较弱。自闭症的谜团之一在于,在几个领域存在缺陷的同时,还伴有相对完好、有时甚至增强的能力。自闭症这种复杂的表现需要在神经层面上对该疾病进行全面且综合的检查。最近一个关于自闭症大脑功能的引人注目的理论——皮质连接不足理论,为自闭症的神经生物学基础提供了一个整合框架。自闭症的皮质连接不足理论表明,任何依赖多个脑区整合的语言、社交或心理功能,都会随着加工需求的增加而容易受到干扰。在自闭症中,大脑中整合回路的功能失调可能会导致广泛的连接不足。换句话说,自闭症患者可能会以牺牲整体为代价,以零碎的方式解读信息。由于大脑区域之间,尤其是额叶皮质和更靠后的区域之间的皮质连接不足现已相对明确,我们可以开始进一步将大脑连接理解为自闭症症状学的一个关键组成部分。朝着这个方向的一个合理的下一步是研究可能介导上述功能连接的解剖学连接。扩散张量成像(DTI)是一种相对新颖的神经影像学技术,它有助于探测大脑中水分子的扩散,以推断白质纤维的完整性。在这项技术中,利用扩散梯度在几个方向上检测大脑中的水分子扩散。虽然功能连接提供了关于在任务执行期间或休息期间不同脑区之间大脑激活同步性的信息,但DTI有助于理解潜在的轴突组织,这可能促进脑区之间的相互交流。本文将把这些技术描述为理解自闭症大脑的宝贵工具以及这一研究方向所涉及的挑战。