The Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Boston, MA, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Apr;470(4):1017-26. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2077-6.
Public reporting of patient health outcomes offers the potential to incentivize quality improvement by fostering increased accountability among providers. Voluntary reporting of risk-adjusted outcomes in cardiac surgery, for example, is viewed as a "watershed event" in healthcare accountability. However, public reporting of outcomes, cost, and quality information in orthopaedic surgery remains limited by comparison, attributable in part to the lack of standard assessment methods and metrics, provider fear of inadequate adjustment of health outcomes for patient characteristics (risk adjustment), and historically weak market demand for this type of information.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We review the origins of public reporting of outcomes in surgical care, identify existing initiatives specific to orthopaedics, outline the challenges and opportunities, and propose recommendations for public reporting of orthopaedic outcomes.
We performed a comprehensive review of the literature through a bibliographic search of MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases from January 1990 to December 2010 to identify articles related to public reporting of surgical outcomes.
Orthopaedic-specific quality reporting efforts include the early FDA adverse event reporting MedWatch program and the involvement of surgeons in the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative. Issues that require more work include balancing different stakeholder perspectives on quality reporting measures and methods, defining accountability and attribution for outcomes, and appropriately risk-adjusting outcomes.
Given the current limitations associated with public reporting of quality and cost in orthopaedic surgery, valuable contributions can be made in developing specialty-specific evidence-based performance measures. We believe through leadership and involvement in policy formulation and development, orthopaedic surgeons are best equipped to accurately and comprehensively inform the quality reporting process and its application to improve the delivery and outcomes of orthopaedic care.
患者健康结果的公开报告有可能通过增强提供者的问责制来激励质量改进。例如,心脏外科风险调整后结果的自愿报告被视为医疗保健问责制的“分水岭事件”。然而,与心脏外科相比,骨科手术结果、成本和质量信息的公开报告仍然受到限制,部分原因是缺乏标准评估方法和指标、提供者担心对患者特征(风险调整)的健康结果调整不足,以及历史上对这类信息的市场需求较弱。
问题/目的:我们回顾了手术护理中结果公开报告的起源,确定了特定于骨科的现有举措,概述了挑战和机遇,并提出了骨科结果公开报告的建议。
我们通过对 MEDLINE 和 Google Scholar 数据库进行文献检索,对 1990 年 1 月至 2010 年 12 月期间与手术结果公开报告相关的文章进行了全面审查。
骨科特定质量报告工作包括早期 FDA 不良事件报告 MedWatch 计划和外科医生参与医师质量报告倡议。需要进一步研究的问题包括平衡质量报告措施和方法的不同利益相关者的观点、定义结果的问责制和归属以及适当的风险调整结果。
鉴于目前骨科手术质量和成本公开报告存在的局限性,在制定特定于专业的基于证据的绩效指标方面,可以做出有价值的贡献。我们相信,通过在政策制定和发展中的领导作用和参与,骨科医生最有能力准确和全面地告知质量报告过程及其在改善骨科护理提供和结果方面的应用。