INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre, ImpAct Team, Lyon, France.
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Nov;49(13):3750-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.033. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
Proper motor control of our own body implies a reliable representation of body parts. This information is supposed to be stored in the Body Schema (BS), a body representation that appears separate from a more perceptual body representation, the Body Image (BI). The dissociation between BS for action and BI for perception, originally based on neuropsychological evidence, has recently become the focus of behavioural studies in physiological conditions. By inducing the rubber hand illusion in healthy participants, Kammers et al. (2009) showed perceptual changes attributable to the BI to which the BS, as indexed via motor tasks, was immune. To more definitively support the existence of dissociable body representations in physiological conditions, here we tested for the opposite dissociation, namely, whether a tool-use paradigm would induce a functional update of the BS (via a motor localization task) without affecting the BI (via a perceptual localization task). Healthy subjects were required to localize three anatomical landmarks on their right arm, before and after using the same arm to control a tool. In addition to this classical task-dependency approach, we assessed whether preferential access to the BS could also depend upon the way positional information about forearm targets is provided, to subsequently execute the same task. To this aim, participants performed either verbally or tactually driven versions of the motor and perceptual localization tasks. Results showed that both the motor and perceptual tasks were sensitive to the update of the forearm representation, but only when the localization task (perceptual or motor) was driven by a tactile input. This pattern reveals that the motor output is not sufficient per se, but has to be coupled with tactually mediated information to guarantee access to the BS. These findings shade a new light on the action-perception models of body representations and underlie how functional plasticity may be a useful tool to clarify their operational definition.
对自身身体进行适当的运动控制意味着对身体部位具有可靠的代表性。这些信息应该存储在身体图式(BS)中,BS 是一种与更具知觉代表性的身体意象(BI)不同的身体代表。BS 用于动作,BI 用于知觉,二者之间的分离最初基于神经心理学证据,最近已成为生理条件下行为研究的焦点。Kammers 等人(2009 年)通过在健康参与者中诱导橡胶手错觉,表明知觉变化归因于 BI,而 BS 则不受影响(通过运动任务索引)。为了更明确地支持生理条件下存在可分离的身体代表,我们在此测试了相反的分离,即工具使用范式是否会引起 BS 的功能更新(通过运动定位任务),而不会影响 BI(通过知觉定位任务)。要求健康受试者在使用相同的手臂控制工具之前和之后,定位其右臂上的三个解剖学标志。除了这种经典的任务依赖性方法之外,我们还评估了工具使用范式是否可以通过提供关于前臂目标的位置信息的方式来优先访问 BS,然后执行相同的任务。为此,参与者执行了口头或触觉驱动的运动和知觉定位任务版本。结果表明,运动和知觉任务都对前臂表示的更新敏感,但仅当定位任务(知觉或运动)由触觉输入驱动时才敏感。这种模式表明,运动输出本身并不足够,而是必须与触觉介导的信息相结合,以保证对 BS 的访问。这些发现为身体代表的动作-知觉模型提供了新的启示,并阐明了功能可塑性如何成为澄清其操作定义的有用工具。