Suppr超能文献

多药策略在治疗重症实验性胰腺炎中是有效的。

Multidrug strategies are effective in the treatment of severe experimental pancreatitis.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Surgery. 2012 Mar;151(3):372-81. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.041. Epub 2011 Oct 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trypsinogen activation, oxygen radicals, cytokines, leukocyte infiltration, and pancreatic ischemia are important steps in the pathogenesis of necrotizing pancreatitis and associated systemic complications. Several drugs that inhibit those pathogenetic steps attenuated biochemical and histologic changes, while survival remained low. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the benefit of multidrug approaches compared to monotherapies on organ injury and survival in acute experimental pancreatitis in the rat model of retrograde bile injection combined with intravenous cerulein.

METHODS

Necrotizing pancreatitis was induced in rats. After a therapy-free interval of 6 hours, 10 treatment regimens were evaluated: multidrug regimen 1, which contained the protease inhibitor gabexate mesilate, oxygen-free radical scavengers, nitric oxide donor L-arginine, a platelet-activating factor antagonist, and antibodies against intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) dissolved in dextran, was compared to multidrug regimen 2 (dextran, acetylcysteine, L-arginine, and anti-ICAM-1), monotherapies of each of the drugs, and standard intravascular volume replacement.

RESULTS

Both multidrug regimens significantly reduced pancreatic and systemic injury and microcirculatory disturbances compared to any of the monotherapies. Treatment with regimen 1 decreased 24-hour mortality to 0% and increased long-term survival to 85% (standard therapy, 70% and 15%, respectively). Multidrug regimen 2 was as effective as regimen 1.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of acute necrotizing pancreatitis with multidrug regimens significantly decreases short-term mortality compared to monotherapies. Moreover, multidrug strategies are still effective after a wide therapeutic window. Key to this effective therapy is the inhibition of microcirculatory disturbances and of the systemic inflammatory response. The experimental superiority of the multidrug approach should be confirmed in a clinical trial.

摘要

背景

胰酶激活、氧自由基、细胞因子、白细胞浸润和胰腺缺血是坏死性胰腺炎及其相关全身并发症发病机制中的重要步骤。几种抑制这些病理步骤的药物减轻了生化和组织学变化,但存活率仍然较低。本研究的目的是评估与单药治疗相比,多药治疗对逆行胆胰管注射联合静脉注射 Cerulein 诱导的大鼠急性实验性胰腺炎模型中器官损伤和存活率的影响。

方法

在大鼠中诱导坏死性胰腺炎。在 6 小时的无治疗间隔后,评估了 10 种治疗方案:多药方案 1 包含蛋白酶抑制剂加贝酯、氧自由基清除剂、一氧化氮供体 L-精氨酸、血小板激活因子拮抗剂和抗细胞间黏附分子-1(ICAM-1)抗体溶解在葡聚糖中,与多药方案 2(葡聚糖、乙酰半胱氨酸、L-精氨酸和抗 ICAM-1)、每种药物的单药治疗以及标准的血管内容量替代进行比较。

结果

与任何单药治疗相比,两种多药方案均显著减轻胰腺和全身损伤以及微循环障碍。方案 1 的治疗将 24 小时死亡率降低至 0%,并将长期存活率提高至 85%(标准治疗分别为 70%和 15%)。方案 2 与方案 1 一样有效。

结论

与单药治疗相比,多药方案治疗急性坏死性胰腺炎可显著降低短期死亡率。此外,在广泛的治疗窗口后,多药策略仍然有效。这种有效治疗的关键是抑制微循环障碍和全身炎症反应。多药治疗的实验优势应在临床试验中得到证实。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验