Department of Surgery and Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Vivantes Hospital Spandau, Neue Bergstr. 6, 13585, Berlin, Germany.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Feb;397(2):283-9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0858-8. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
The use of a mesh with good biocompatibility properties is of decisive importance for the avoidance of recurrences and chronic pain in endoscopic hernia repair surgery. As we know from numerous experiments and clinical experience, large-pore, lightweight polypropylene meshes possess the best biocompatibility. However, large-pore meshes of different polymers may be used as well and might be an alternative solution.
Utilizing a totally extraperitoneal technique in an established animal model, 20 domestic pigs were implanted with either a lightweight large-pore polypropylene (PP) mesh (Optilene® LP) or a medium-weight large-pore knitted polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE) mesh (GORE® INFINIT® mesh). After 94 days, the pigs were sacrificed and postmortem diagnostic laparoscopy was performed, followed by explantation of the specimens for macroscopic, histological and immunohistochemical evaluation.
The mean mesh shrinkage rate was 14.2% for Optilene® LP vs. 24.7% for INFINIT® mesh (p = 0.017). The partial volume of the inflammatory cells was 11.2% for Optilene® LP vs. 13.9% for INFINIT (n.s.). CD68 was significantly higher for INFINIT (11.8% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.007). The markers of cell turnover, namely Ki67 and the apoptotic index, were comparable at 6.4% vs. 12.4% (n.s.) and 1.6% vs. 2.0% (n.s.). In the extracellular matrix, TGF-β was 35.4% for Optilene® LP and 31.0% for INFINIT® (n.s.). Collagen I (pos/300 μm) deposits were 117.8 and 114.9, respectively.
In our experimental examinations, Optilene® LP and INFINIT® showed a comparable biocompatibility in terms of chronic inflammatory reaction; however, the shrinkage rate was significantly higher for INFINIT® after 3 months. The higher shrinkage rate of INFINIT® should be taken into account when choosing the mesh size for an adequate hernia overlap.
在经内镜疝修补术中,使用具有良好生物相容性的网片对于避免复发和慢性疼痛至关重要。我们从大量的实验和临床经验中得知,大孔、轻质的聚丙烯网片具有最佳的生物相容性。然而,也可以使用不同聚合物的大孔网片,这可能是一种替代解决方案。
在一个已建立的动物模型中,使用完全腹膜外技术,将 20 头国产猪分别植入轻质大孔聚丙烯(Optilene® LP)或中质大孔编织聚四氟乙烯(GORE® INFINIT® 网片)。94 天后,将猪处死并进行剖腹诊断腹腔镜检查,然后取出标本进行大体、组织学和免疫组织化学评估。
Optilene® LP 的平均网片收缩率为 14.2%,而 INFINIT® 网片为 24.7%(p=0.017)。Optilene® LP 的炎症细胞部分体积为 11.2%,而 INFINIT 为 13.9%(无统计学意义)。CD68 在 INFINIT 中的表达明显更高(11.8%比 5.6%,p=0.007)。细胞转化的标志物,即 Ki67 和凋亡指数,分别为 6.4%比 12.4%(无统计学意义)和 1.6%比 2.0%(无统计学意义)。在细胞外基质中,Optilene® LP 的 TGF-β 为 35.4%,INFINIT® 为 31.0%(无统计学意义)。I 型胶原(pos/300μm)沉积分别为 117.8 和 114.9。
在我们的实验研究中,Optilene® LP 和 INFINIT® 在慢性炎症反应方面表现出相当的生物相容性;然而,3 个月后 INFINIT® 的收缩率明显更高。在选择合适的疝重叠尺寸时,应考虑 INFINIT® 的较高收缩率。