Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs, Stockholm University, Sweden.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2012 Jan;36(1):113-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01597.x. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
Previous research has suggested a positive risk-relationship between volume of consumption and adverse behavioral and social consequences of drinking. However, because the risk-relationship may be modified by factors such as pattern of drinking, attributes of social drinking contexts, and drunken comportment, the shape of the risk-function appear to be contingent upon the larger cultural context of drinking.
In this article, I use graphical risk-curve analyses and model estimations to assess how the risk of experiencing alcohol-related problems is associated with self-reported volume of alcohol consumption in the 3 Baltic countries (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania) as well as Sweden and Italy. The analysis utilized data from 2 general population surveys (including Sweden plus Italy and the Baltic countries, respectively) with approximately 1,000 respondents from each country.
The risk-curves for the 3 Baltic countries and Sweden were fairly parallel and clearly steeper than that for Italy. In the logistic regression models, the country-specific Baltic estimates were not entirely homogenous; for Estonia and Latvia, the estimates were similar to that for Sweden and significantly larger than that for Italy, whereas the estimate for Lithuania did not differ significantly from that for Italy. However, the negative binominal regression models suggested that increasing volume of consumption is associated with the risk of experiencing a larger number of different problems in all 3 Baltic countries and Sweden than in Italy. Overall, the result thus suggests that there is a significant relationship between volume of consumption and risk of experiencing alcohol-related problems in all countries but that the relationship generally is stronger in the Baltic countries and Sweden than in Italy.
The results were largely in line with the hypothesis of a European north to south gradient in the strength of the risk-relationship, but also add that most Baltic countries may be placed alongside the Nordic countries in this context. Because only volume of consumption is considered, the results cannot be used to specify which factors and mechanisms that actually modify the shape of the risk-function in each culture.
先前的研究表明,饮酒量与饮酒的不良行为和社会后果之间存在正相关风险关系。然而,由于风险关系可能会受到诸如饮酒模式、社交饮酒环境的属性以及醉酒行为等因素的影响,因此风险函数的形状似乎取决于饮酒的更大文化背景。
在本文中,我使用图形风险曲线分析和模型估计来评估在 3 个波罗的海国家(爱沙尼亚、拉脱维亚和立陶宛)以及瑞典和意大利,自我报告的酒精摄入量与酒精相关问题的风险之间的关联。该分析利用了来自 2 项一般人群调查的数据(分别包括瑞典加意大利和波罗的海国家),每个国家约有 1000 名受访者。
3 个波罗的海国家和瑞典的风险曲线相当平行,且明显比意大利陡峭。在逻辑回归模型中,特定于国家的波罗的海估计值并非完全一致;对于爱沙尼亚和拉脱维亚,这些估计值与瑞典相似,且显著大于意大利,而立陶宛的估计值与意大利无显著差异。然而,负二项回归模型表明,在所有 3 个波罗的海国家和瑞典,饮酒量的增加与经历更多不同问题的风险相关,而在意大利则并非如此。总体而言,结果表明,所有国家的饮酒量与酒精相关问题的风险之间存在显著关系,但这种关系在波罗的海国家和瑞典通常比在意大利更强。
结果在很大程度上符合欧洲从北到南的风险关系强度梯度的假设,但也表明大多数波罗的海国家在这种情况下可能与北欧国家并列。由于只考虑了饮酒量,因此结果不能用于指定哪些因素和机制实际上在每种文化中改变了风险函数的形状。