South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026208. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
Understanding how biodiversity responds to environmental changes is essential to provide the evidence-base that underpins conservation initiatives. The present study provides a standardized comparison between unbaited flight intercept traps (FIT) and baited pitfall traps (BPT) for sampling dung beetles. We examine the effectiveness of the two to assess fire disturbance effects and how trap performance is affected by seasonality. The study was carried out in a transitional forest between Cerrado (Brazilian Savanna) and Amazon Forest. Dung beetles were collected during one wet and one dry sampling season. The two methods sampled different portions of the local beetle assemblage. Both FIT and BPT were sensitive to fire disturbance during the wet season, but only BPT detected community differences during the dry season. Both traps showed similar correlation with environmental factors. Our results indicate that seasonality had a stronger effect than trap type, with BPT more effective and robust under low population numbers, and FIT more sensitive to fine scale heterogeneity patterns. This study shows the strengths and weaknesses of two commonly used methodologies for sampling dung beetles in tropical forests, as well as highlighting the importance of seasonality in shaping the results obtained by both sampling strategies.
了解生物多样性如何对环境变化做出响应对于提供支持保护措施的基础证据至关重要。本研究对无诱饵飞行截获陷阱(FIT)和诱饵陷阱(BPT)在采集粪甲虫方面进行了标准化比较。我们检验了这两种方法的有效性,以评估火灾干扰的影响以及陷阱性能如何受到季节性的影响。该研究在塞拉多(巴西稀树草原)和亚马逊森林之间的过渡森林中进行。粪甲虫在一个湿季和一个干季进行采集。这两种方法采集了当地甲虫组合的不同部分。FIT 和 BPT 都对湿季的火灾干扰敏感,但只有 BPT 检测到干季的群落差异。两种陷阱与环境因素都显示出相似的相关性。我们的结果表明,季节性的影响比陷阱类型更强,BPT 在种群数量较低时更有效和稳健,而 FIT 对小尺度异质性模式更敏感。本研究展示了两种常用于热带森林采集粪甲虫的常用方法的优缺点,同时强调了季节性对两种采样策略获得的结果的重要性。