New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (MCR, CCG, BE)
New York University School of Public Policy, New York, NY (CCG, BE)
Med Decis Making. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):311-26. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11421414. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
Little is known about how patients served by safety-net hospitals utilize and respond to hospital quality data.
To understand how vulnerable, lower income patients make health care decisions and define quality of care and whether hospital quality data factor into such decisions and definitions.
Mixed quantitative and qualitative methods were used to gather primary data from patients at an urban, tertiary-care safety-net hospital. The study hospital is a member of the first public hospital system to voluntarily post hospital quality data online for public access. Patients were recruited from outpatient and inpatient clinics. Surveys were used to collect data on participants' sociodemographic characteristics, health literacy, health care experiences, and satisfaction variables. Focus groups were used to explore a representative sample of 24 patients' health care decision making and views of quality. Data from focus group transcripts were iteratively coded and analyzed by the authors.
Focus group participants were similar to the broader diverse, low-income clinic. Participants reported exercising choice in making decisions about where to seek health care. Multiple sources influenced decision-making processes including participants' own beliefs and values, social influences, and prior experiences. Hospital quality data were notably absent as a source of influence in health care decision making for this population largely because participants were unaware of its existence. Participants' views of hospital quality were influenced by the quality and efficiency of services provided (with an emphasis on the doctor-patient relationship) and patient centeredness. When presented with it, patients appreciated the hospital quality data and, with guidance, were interested in incorporating it into health care decision making.
Results suggest directions for optimizing the presentation, content, and availability of hospital quality data. Future research will explore how similar populations form and make choices based on presentation of hospital quality data.
对于服务于医疗保障体系医院的患者如何利用和响应医院质量数据,人们知之甚少。
了解弱势、低收入患者如何做出医疗决策,定义医疗质量,以及医院质量数据是否会影响这些决策和定义。
采用混合定量和定性方法,从一家城市三级保健保障体系医院的门诊和住院患者中收集原始数据。该研究医院是第一家自愿将医院质量数据在线发布供公众访问的公立医院系统的成员。从门诊和住院诊所招募患者。调查用于收集参与者的社会人口特征、健康素养、医疗保健经验和满意度变量的数据。焦点小组用于探索 24 名患者的代表性样本的医疗保健决策制定和质量观点。作者对焦点小组转录本的数据进行了迭代编码和分析。
焦点小组参与者与更广泛的多样化、低收入诊所相似。参与者报告在决定去哪里寻求医疗保健时行使选择权。多种来源影响决策过程,包括参与者自己的信仰和价值观、社会影响和以往的经验。医院质量数据作为影响这一人群医疗保健决策的一个主要因素,因为参与者不知道其存在,因此在很大程度上不存在。参与者对医院质量的看法受到所提供服务的质量和效率(强调医患关系)以及以患者为中心的影响。当向他们展示医院质量数据时,患者很欣赏这些数据,并在指导下有兴趣将其纳入医疗保健决策中。
结果表明了优化医院质量数据的呈现、内容和可用性的方向。未来的研究将探讨类似人群如何根据医院质量数据的呈现形成和做出选择。