Division of Nephrology, Department ofMedicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Jan;7(1):116-22. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02820311. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
Data collected by the US Renal Data System (USRDS) identify sudden cardiac death (SCD) as the leading cause of death among hemodialysis patients. However, evidence suggests that clinical events captured on the USRDS death notification form may be inaccurate. A new method for classifying SCD was recently developed to enhance the accuracy of SCD classification. This study examined the performance characteristics of this refined definition using a cohort of hemodialysis patients who experienced a witnessed SCD as the reference standard.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 363 patients who experienced a witnessed SCD in US Gambro (DaVita) outpatient dialysis clinics. Sensitivity of SCD defined by death notification forms and SCD defined using additional administrative sources was compared. Clinical data recorded near time of death were also examined.
Existing USRDS death notification forms reported 70.8% of witnessed SCD as "cardiac arrest/cause unknown" or "arrhythmia." The refined definition significantly improved identification to 83.8% of witnessed SCD events (P<0.001). Verified SCD cases that were not identified by either definition were more likely to be reported on the death notification form as death due to myocardial infarction, hyperkalemia, sepsis, malignancy, or unknown cause.
Compared with the death notification form alone, the refined SCD definition significantly improves the sensitivity of reporting of witnessed SCD occurring within outpatient hemodialysis clinics. More accurate reporting of cardiac events by clinicians and refinements to existing death notification forms may further improve recognition and understanding of SCD.
美国肾脏数据系统(USRDS)收集的数据表明,心源性猝死(SCD)是血液透析患者的主要死亡原因。然而,有证据表明,USRDS 死亡通知表中记录的临床事件可能并不准确。最近开发了一种新的 SCD 分类方法,以提高 SCD 分类的准确性。本研究使用经历目击 SCD 的血液透析患者队列作为参考标准,检验了这种新定义的性能特征。
设计、地点、参与者和测量:这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 363 名在美国 Gambro(DaVita)门诊透析诊所经历目击 SCD 的患者。比较了死亡通知表定义的 SCD 和使用额外行政来源定义的 SCD 的敏感性。还检查了接近死亡时间记录的临床数据。
现有的 USRDS 死亡通知表报告 70.8%的目击 SCD 为“心搏骤停/原因不明”或“心律失常”。细化定义可将目击 SCD 事件的识别率显著提高至 83.8%(P<0.001)。细化定义未识别的经核实的 SCD 病例更可能在死亡通知表中报告为心肌梗死、高钾血症、败血症、恶性肿瘤或不明原因导致的死亡。
与单独使用死亡通知表相比,细化的 SCD 定义可显著提高门诊血液透析诊所中发生的目击 SCD 的报告敏感性。临床医生更准确地报告心脏事件和对现有死亡通知表的细化,可能进一步提高对 SCD 的识别和理解。