Harvard University, USA.
J Law Med Ethics. 2011 Winter;39(4):662-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00633.x.
This article compares the means that the United States, France, and Japan use to oversee pharmaceutical industry-physician financial relationships. These countries rely on professional and/or industry ethical codes, anti-kickback laws, and fair trade practice laws. They restrict kickbacks the most strictly, allow wide latitude on gifts, and generally permit drug firms to fund professional activities and associations. Consequently, to avoid legal liability, drug firms often replace kickbacks with gifts and grants. The paper concludes by proposing reforms that address problems that persist when firms replace kickbacks with gifts and grants based on the experience of the three countries.
本文比较了美国、法国和日本监督医药行业-医师财务关系的手段。这些国家依赖专业和/或行业道德规范、反回扣法以及公平贸易实践法。它们对回扣的限制最为严格,对礼物的规定则较为宽松,并普遍允许制药公司为专业活动和协会提供资金。因此,为了避免法律责任,制药公司经常用礼物和赠款取代回扣。本文最后提出了一些改革建议,这些建议是基于这三个国家的经验提出的,旨在解决制药公司用礼物和赠款取代回扣所带来的问题。