Bouras Triantafyllos, Gatzonis Stergios-Sylianos, Georgakoulias Nikolaos, Karatza Marilena, Siatouni Anna, Stranjalis George, Boviatsis Efstathios, Vasileiou Spyridoula, Sakas Damianos E
Department of Neurosurgery, Evaggelismos Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Department of Neurosurgery, Geniko Kratiko Hospital, Holargos, Greece.
J Neurotrauma. 2021 Apr 15;38(8):1137-1150. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.1790.
Cytokine measurement directly from the brain parenchyma by means of microdialysis has documented the activation of certain procedures , after brain trauma in humans. However, the intercalation of the micro-catheter insertion with the phenomena triggered by the head trauma renders the assessment of the findings problematic. The present study attempts to elucidate the pure effect of minimal trauma, represented by the insertion of the micro-catheter, on the non-traumatized human brain. Microdialysis catheters were implanted in 12 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, and subjected to invasive electroencephalography with intracranial electrodes. Samples were collected during the first 5 days of monitoring. The dialysate was analyzed using bead flow cytometry, and the concentrations of interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were measured. The levels of IL-1 and IL-8 were found to be raised until 48 h post-implantation, and thereafter they reached a plateau of presumably baseline values. The temporal profile of the IL-6 variation was different, with the increase being much more prolonged, as its concentration had not returned to baseline levels at the fifth day post-insertion. TNF-α was found to be significantly raised only 2 h after implantation. IL-10 and IL-12 did not have any significant response to micro-trauma. These findings imply that the reaction of the neuro-inflammatory mechanisms of the brain exist even after minimal trauma, and is unexpectedly intense for IL-6. Questions may arise regarding the objectivity of findings attributed by some studies to inflammatory perturbation after head injury.
通过微透析直接从脑实质中测量细胞因子,已经证明了人类脑外伤后某些过程的激活。然而,微导管插入与头部外伤引发的现象相互交织,使得对研究结果的评估存在问题。本研究试图阐明以微导管插入为代表的最小创伤对未受创伤的人脑的纯粹影响。将微透析导管植入12例耐药性癫痫患者体内,并使用颅内电极进行侵入性脑电图检查。在监测的前5天收集样本。使用微珠流式细胞术分析透析液,并测量白细胞介素(IL)-1、IL-6、IL-8、IL-10、IL-12和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)的浓度。发现IL-1和IL-8的水平在植入后48小时内升高,此后达到可能为基线值的平台期。IL-6变化的时间曲线不同,其升高持续时间更长,因为在插入后第5天其浓度尚未恢复到基线水平。发现TNF-α仅在植入后2小时显著升高。IL-10和IL-12对微创伤没有任何显著反应。这些发现表明,即使是最小的创伤后,脑的神经炎症机制也会产生反应,而且对IL-6来说这种反应出乎意料地强烈。对于一些研究将头部损伤后的炎症扰动归因于研究结果的客观性,可能会产生疑问。