Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Hazrat Rasool Teaching Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Feb;160(2):201-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.11.001. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
To compare the dermatoglyphic characteristics of women with and without breast cancer.
Case-control study. One hundred and thirty women=130 women with histopathologically confirmed breast cancer (case group) were compared with 127 women in the same age group but without breast cancer (control group). Fingerprints of the two groups were compared in terms of whorl, loop and arch patterns.
The loop pattern was most common in both groups [68 women (52.3%) in the case group and 58 women (45.7%) in the control group], followed by the whorl pattern [60 women (46.2%) in the case group and 64 women (50.4%) in the control group]; the difference was not significant (p=0.337). The number of whorl patterns and the breakdown by classification group did not differ significantly between the two groups. In addition, no significant difference was found in the dermatologlyphic patterns of the women with breast cancer with and without a family history of breast cancer.
No difference was found in the dermatoglyphic characteristics of women with and without breast cancer. As such, this does not appear to be an effective screening method for women at risk for breast cancer.
比较乳腺癌患者与非乳腺癌患者的皮纹特征。
病例对照研究。将 130 例经组织病理学证实的乳腺癌患者(病例组)与同年龄组的 127 例无乳腺癌患者(对照组)进行比较。比较两组的斗、箕和弓纹模式。
两组最常见的是环纹模式[病例组 68 例(52.3%),对照组 58 例(45.7%)],其次是涡纹模式[病例组 60 例(46.2%),对照组 64 例(50.4%)];差异无统计学意义(p=0.337)。两组的涡纹模式数量和分类组的分布差异无统计学意义。此外,乳腺癌患者中有无乳腺癌家族史的皮纹模式也无明显差异。
乳腺癌患者与非乳腺癌患者的皮纹特征无差异。因此,这似乎不是一种针对乳腺癌高危女性的有效筛查方法。