Suppr超能文献

非致命性自伤行为的方法与最终自杀有何关联?

How do methods of non-fatal self-harm relate to eventual suicide?

机构信息

Centre for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2012 Feb;136(3):526-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.10.036. Epub 2011 Nov 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Methods used at an index episode of non-fatal self-harm may predict risk of future suicide. Little is known of suicide risk associated with most recent non-fatal method, and whether or not change in method is important.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 30,202 patients from the Multicentre Study of Self-harm in England presenting to six hospitals with self-harm, 2000-2007, was followed up to 2010 using national death registers. Risks of suicide (by self-poisoning, self-injury, and all methods) associated with recent method(s) of non-fatal self-harm were estimated using Cox models.

RESULTS

Suicide occurred in 378 individuals. Cutting, hanging/asphyxiation, CO/other gas, traffic-related and other self-injury at the last episode of self-harm were associated with 1.8 to 5-fold increased risks (vs. self-poisoning) of subsequent suicide, particularly suicide involving self-injury. All methods of self-harm had similar risks of suicide by self-poisoning. One-third who died by suicide used the same method for their last self-harm and for suicide, including 41% who self-poisoned. No specific sequences of self-poisoning, cutting or other self-injury in the last two non-fatal episodes were associated with suicide in individuals with repeated self-harm.

LIMITATIONS

Data were for hospital presentations only, and lacked a suicide intent measure.

CONCLUSIONS

Method of self-harm may aid identification of individuals at high risk of suicide. Individuals using more dangerous methods (e.g. hanging, CO/other gas) should receive intensive follow-up. Method changes in repeated self-harm were not associated with suicide. Our findings reinforce national guidance that all patients presenting with self-harm, regardless of method, should receive a psychosocial assessment.

摘要

背景

非致命性自伤首次发作时所采用的方法可能预示着未来自杀的风险。人们对与最近非致命性方法相关的自杀风险知之甚少,也不知道方法的改变是否重要。

方法

一项前瞻性队列研究纳入了 2000 年至 2007 年期间在英格兰 6 家医院因自伤就诊的 30202 名患者,通过全国死亡登记处对这些患者进行了 2010 年之前的随访。使用 Cox 模型评估与最近非致命性自伤方法相关的自杀(通过自伤、自伤和所有方法)风险。

结果

378 人发生自杀。在最后一次自伤发作时,切割、上吊/窒息、CO/其他气体、与交通相关的和其他自伤与随后自杀的风险增加 1.8 至 5 倍(与自伤相比),特别是涉及自伤的自杀。所有自伤方法与自伤导致的自杀风险相似。三分之一自杀死亡者使用相同的方法进行最后一次自伤和自杀,其中包括 41%的自伤者。在重复自伤者中,最近两次非致命性发作中没有特定的自伤顺序与自杀相关。

局限性

数据仅来自医院就诊,缺乏自杀意图的衡量标准。

结论

自伤方法可以帮助识别自杀风险较高的个体。使用更危险方法(如上吊、CO/其他气体)的个体应接受强化随访。重复自伤中的方法变化与自杀无关。我们的发现强化了国家指导意见,即无论方法如何,所有因自伤就诊的患者都应接受心理社会评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验