College of Physical Education, Federal University of Vale do São Francisco (UNIVASF), PE, Brazil.
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Oct;26(10):2806-11. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318242a609.
This study compared the effects of resistance exercise (RE) intensities on blood glucose (GLUC) of individuals without (ND) and with type-2 diabetes (T2D). Nine individuals with T2D and 10 ND performed: (a) RE circuit at 23% of 1 maximal repetition (1RM) (RE_L); (b) RE circuit at 43% 1RM (RE_M); and (c) control (CON) session. Blood lactate (LAC) and GLUC were measured before, during, and postinterventions. Double product (DP) and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded. The area under the curve (AUC) revealed the effects of RE circuits in reducing GLUC in individuals with T2D (RE_L: 12,556 ± 3,269 vs. RE_M: 13,433 ± 3,054 vs. CON: 14,576 ± 3,922 mg.dl(-1).145 minutes; p < 0.05) with a lower AUC of GLUC in RE_L in comparison to RE_M. Similarly, for ND the RE_L reduced the AUC of GLUC when compared with RE_M and CON (RE_L: 10,943 ± 956 vs. RE_M: 12,156 ± 1,062 vs. CON: 11,498 ± 882 mg.dl(-1).145 minutes; p < 0.05). The AUC of GLUC was higher for T2D compared with ND on CON condition (p = 0.02). However, after RE circuits the difference between groups for AUC of GLUC was abolished. The RE_M for T2D was more stressful when compared with RE_L for LAC (CON: 1.3 ± 0.5 vs. RE_L: 5.5 ± 1.5 vs. RE_M: 6.8 ± 1.3 mmol·L(-1); p < 0.05), DP (CON: 8,415 ± 1,223 vs. RE_L: 15,980 ± 2,007 vs. RE_M: 18,047 ± 3,693 mmHg.bpm(-1); p < 0.05), and RPE (RE_L: 11 ± 2 vs. RE_M: 13 ± 2 Borg Scale; p < 0.05). We concluded that RE_L and RE_M were effective in reducing GLUC for individuals with T2D, with lower cardiovascular-metabolic and perceptual stress being observed for RE_L. These data suggest that acute RE sessions at light or moderate intensities are effective for controlling GLUC in individuals with T2D.
本研究比较了不同强度的抗阻运动(RE)对 2 型糖尿病(T2D)和非 2 型糖尿病(ND)个体血糖(GLUC)的影响。9 名 T2D 患者和 10 名 ND 患者分别进行了以下三种干预:(a)23%最大重复次数 1 次(1RM)的 RE 循环(RE_L);(b)43% 1RM 的 RE 循环(RE_M);(c)对照(CON)。在干预前、干预中和干预后测量血乳酸(LAC)和 GLUC。记录双乘积(DP)和感觉用力等级(RPE)。曲线下面积(AUC)揭示了 RE 循环在降低 T2D 个体 GLUC 方面的作用(RE_L:12556 ± 3269 与 RE_M:13433 ± 3054 与 CON:14576 ± 3922 mg.dl(-1).145 分钟;p < 0.05),与 RE_M 相比,RE_L 的 GLUC AUC 更低。同样,对于 ND,与 RE_M 和 CON 相比,RE_L 降低了 GLUC 的 AUC(RE_L:10943 ± 956 与 RE_M:12156 ± 1062 与 CON:11498 ± 882 mg.dl(-1).145 分钟;p < 0.05)。与 ND 相比,T2D 在 CON 条件下的 GLUC AUC 更高(p = 0.02)。然而,在进行 RE 循环后,两组之间 GLUC AUC 的差异消失了。与 RE_L 相比,T2D 的 RE_M 对 LAC 的应激更大(CON:1.3 ± 0.5 与 RE_L:5.5 ± 1.5 与 RE_M:6.8 ± 1.3 mmol·L(-1);p < 0.05),DP(CON:8415 ± 1223 与 RE_L:15980 ± 2007 与 RE_M:18047 ± 3693 mmHg.bpm(-1);p < 0.05)和 RPE(RE_L:11 ± 2 与 RE_M:13 ± 2 Borg 量表;p < 0.05)。我们得出结论,RE_L 和 RE_M 对 T2D 个体降低 GLUC 有效,而 RE_L 对心血管代谢和感知的压力较低。这些数据表明,急性低强度或中等强度的 RE 运动对控制 T2D 个体的 GLUC 有效。