Suppr超能文献

家庭医生会检索他们之前作为电子邮件提醒阅读过的临床研究摘要吗?

Do family physicians retrieve synopses of clinical research previously read as email alerts?

作者信息

Grad Roland, Pluye Pierre, Johnson-Lafleur Janique, Granikov Vera, Shulha Michael, Bartlett Gillian, Marlow Bernard

机构信息

Information Technology Primary Care Research Group, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2011 Nov 30;13(4):e101. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1683.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A synopsis of new clinical research highlights important aspects of one study in a brief structured format. When delivered as email alerts, synopses enable clinicians to become aware of new developments relevant for practice. Once read, a synopsis can become a known item of clinical information. In time-pressured situations, remembering a known item may facilitate information retrieval by the clinician. However, exactly how synopses first delivered as email alerts influence retrieval at some later time is not known.

OBJECTIVES

We examined searches for clinical information in which a synopsis previously read as an email alert was retrieved (defined as a dyad). Our study objectives were to (1) examine whether family physicians retrieved synopses they previously read as email alerts and then to (2) explore whether family physicians purposefully retrieved these synopses.

METHODS

We conducted a mixed-methods study in which a qualitative multiple case study explored the retrieval of email alerts within a prospective longitudinal cohort of practicing family physicians. Reading of research-based synopses was tracked in two contexts: (1) push, meaning to read on email and (2) pull, meaning to read after retrieval from one electronic knowledge resource. Dyads, defined as synopses first read as email alerts and subsequently retrieved in a search of a knowledge resource, were prospectively identified. Participants were interviewed about all of their dyads. Outcomes were the total number of dyads and their type.

RESULTS

Over a period of 341 days, 194 unique synopses delivered to 41 participants resulted in 4937 synopsis readings. In all, 1205 synopses were retrieved over an average of 320 days. Of the 1205 retrieved synopses, 21 (1.7%) were dyads made by 17 family physicians. Of the 1205 retrieved synopses, 6 (0.5%) were known item type dyads. However, dyads also occurred serendipitously.

CONCLUSION

In the single knowledge resource we studied, email alerts containing research-based synopses were rarely retrieved. Our findings help us to better understand the effect of push on pull and to improve the integration of research-based information within electronic resources for clinicians.

摘要

背景

新临床研究的概要以简洁的结构化形式突出了一项研究的重要方面。当以电子邮件提醒的形式发送时,概要能让临床医生了解与实践相关的新进展。一旦阅读,概要就会成为临床信息中的一个已知项目。在时间紧迫的情况下,记住一个已知项目可能会便于临床医生检索信息。然而,最初以电子邮件提醒形式发送的概要在之后的某个时间究竟如何影响信息检索尚不清楚。

目的

我们研究了对临床信息的检索,其中检索到了之前作为电子邮件提醒阅读过的概要(定义为二元组)。我们的研究目标是:(1)检查家庭医生是否检索到他们之前作为电子邮件提醒阅读过的概要,然后(2)探究家庭医生是否有目的地检索这些概要。

方法

我们进行了一项混合方法研究,其中定性多案例研究在前瞻性纵向队列的执业家庭医生中探索电子邮件提醒的检索情况。在两种情况下跟踪基于研究的概要的阅读:(1)推送,即在电子邮件上阅读;(2)拉取,即在从一个电子知识资源中检索后阅读。前瞻性地确定二元组,即最初作为电子邮件提醒阅读并随后在知识资源搜索中检索到的概要。就所有二元组对参与者进行访谈。结果是二元组的总数及其类型。

结果

在341天的时间里,发送给41名参与者的194份独特概要产生了4937次概要阅读。总共在平均320天内检索到1205份概要。在检索到的1205份概要中,21份(1.7%)是由17名家庭医生形成的二元组。在检索到的1205份概要中,6份(0.5%)是已知项目类型的二元组。然而,二元组也有偶然出现的情况。

结论

在我们研究的单一知识资源中,包含基于研究的概要的电子邮件提醒很少被检索到。我们的研究结果有助于我们更好地理解推送对拉取的影响,并改善临床医生电子资源中基于研究的信息整合。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dc5/3278087/08632848c19b/jmir_v13i4e101_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验