Department of Medicine, University of Muenster, Muenster D-48129, Germany.
Haematologica. 2012 May;97(5):784-91. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.044271. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
Thalidomide has potent antimyeloma activity, but no prospective, randomized controlled trial has evaluated thalidomide monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
We conducted an international, randomized, open-label, four-arm, phase III trial to compare three different doses of thalidomide (100, 200, or 400 mg/day) with standard dexamethasone in patients who had received one to three prior therapies. The primary end-point was time to progression.
In the intent-to-treat population (N=499), the median time to progression was 6.1, 7.0, 7.6, and 9.1 months in patients treated with dexamethasone, and thalidomide 100, 200, and 400 mg/day, respectively; the difference between treatment groups was not statistically significant. In the per-protocol population (n=465), the median time to progression was 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, and 9.1 months, respectively. In patients who had received two or three prior therapies, thalidomide significantly prolonged the time to progression at all dose levels compared to the result achieved with dexamethasone. Response rates and median survival were similar in all treatment groups, but the median duration of response was significantly longer in all thalidomide groups than in the dexamethasone group. Adverse events reported in the thalidomide groups, such as fatigue, constipation and neuropathy, confirmed the known safety profile of thalidomide.
Although thalidomide was not superior to dexamethasone in this randomized trial, thalidomide monotherapy may be considered an effective salvage therapy option for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, particularly those with a good prognosis and those who have received two or three prior therapies. The recommended starting dose of thalidomide monotherapy is 400 mg/day, which can be rapidly reduced for patients who do not tolerate this treatment. (
NCT00452569).
沙利度胺具有很强的抗骨髓瘤活性,但尚无前瞻性、随机对照试验评估沙利度胺单药治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者。
我们进行了一项国际性、随机、开放标签、四臂、III 期试验,比较了三种不同剂量的沙利度胺(100、200 或 400 mg/天)与标准地塞米松在接受 1 至 3 种既往治疗的患者中的疗效。主要终点是无进展生存期。
在意向治疗人群(N=499)中,接受地塞米松和沙利度胺 100、200 和 400 mg/天治疗的患者中位无进展生存期分别为 6.1、7.0、7.6 和 9.1 个月;各组间差异无统计学意义。在符合方案人群(n=465)中,中位无进展生存期分别为 6.0、7.0、8.0 和 9.1 个月。在接受两种或三种既往治疗的患者中,与地塞米松相比,所有剂量水平的沙利度胺均显著延长了无进展生存期。所有治疗组的缓解率和中位总生存期相似,但所有沙利度胺组的中位缓解持续时间均显著长于地塞米松组。沙利度胺组报告的不良反应,如疲劳、便秘和周围神经病变,证实了沙利度胺已知的安全性。
尽管在这项随机试验中沙利度胺并不优于地塞米松,但沙利度胺单药治疗可能被视为复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的有效挽救治疗选择,特别是那些预后良好且接受两种或三种既往治疗的患者。沙利度胺单药治疗的推荐起始剂量为 400 mg/天,对于不能耐受该治疗的患者可迅速减少剂量。(临床试验注册号:NCT00452569)。