Suppr超能文献

无镇静下结肠镜检查时应用氧化亚氮镇痛。

Nitrous oxide for analgesia in colonoscopy without sedation.

机构信息

The Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Dec;74(6):1347-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.071.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colonoscopy is associated with pain and discomfort, and intravenous analgesics and sedatives are widely used. There are several disadvantages regarding this practice, including risk of complications, resources demanded, and amnesia after sedation. In spite of promising results in previous studies, nitrous oxide is rarely used at endoscopy centers around the world.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficiency of nitrous oxide versus placebo as an analgesic during colonoscopy without sedation.

DESIGN

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

The endoscopy unit at Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway, between June 2006 and May 2008.

PATIENTS

This study involved patients undergoing elective colonoscopy.

INTERVENTION

Patients inhaled nitrous oxide or placebo on demand.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The participants filled in a questionnaire regarding their experiences with the examination. Pain was graded from 1 (no pain) to 4 (severe pain).

RESULTS

We recruited 199 patients. We randomized 97 patients to the nitrous oxide group and 102 to the control group. The groups were comparable regarding demographic factors. Median patient-reported pain was 2 in both the nitrous oxide group and the control group (interquartile range 2-3 in both groups). Additional sedatives and analgesics were given equally often and in similar doses in both groups. No side effects related to administration of nitrous oxide were reported.

LIMITATIONS

The questionnaire was returned by 76% of the patients. The study gas was given on demand, not continuously.

CONCLUSION

Nitrous oxide given intermittently is not an effective substitution for intravenous on-demand sedation and analgesics in the setting of colonoscopy without sedation.

摘要

背景

结肠镜检查会引起疼痛和不适,因此广泛使用静脉内镇痛剂和镇静剂。但这种做法存在一些缺点,包括发生并发症的风险、对资源的需求以及镇静后健忘等。尽管之前的研究结果令人鼓舞,但在世界范围内,氧化亚氮在内镜中心的使用仍然很少。

目的

研究在无镇静的结肠镜检查中,氧化亚氮作为镇痛剂的效果,与安慰剂相比。

设计

双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。

地点

挪威奥斯陆大学医院 Rikshospitalet 的内镜室,时间为 2006 年 6 月至 2008 年 5 月。

患者

本研究纳入了接受择期结肠镜检查的患者。

干预

患者按需吸入氧化亚氮或安慰剂。

主要观察指标

参与者填写一份关于检查体验的问卷。疼痛程度分级为 1(无痛)至 4(重度疼痛)。

结果

共纳入 199 例患者。我们将 97 例患者随机分配至氧化亚氮组,102 例患者分配至对照组。两组患者的人口统计学因素相似。中位数患者报告的疼痛程度在氧化亚氮组和对照组均为 2 分(两组的四分位间距均为 2-3 分)。两组均同样频繁地给予额外的镇静剂和镇痛药,且剂量相似。未报告与氧化亚氮给药相关的副作用。

局限性

只有 76%的患者返回了问卷。研究用气体是按需给予的,而不是连续给予。

结论

在无镇静的结肠镜检查中,间歇性给予氧化亚氮不能有效替代按需静脉内镇静和镇痛剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验