Digital tomosynthesis for aortic arch calcification evaluation: performance comparison with chest radiography with CT as the reference standard.

BACKGROUND

Recently developed digital tomosynthesis has shown improved detection of pulmonary lesions with a radiation dose comparable to conventional CR but with a much lower radiation dose than CT.

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance of digital tomosynthesis (DT) with that of chest radiography (CR) for the detection of aortic arch calcification (AAC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 100 patients who underwent multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), DT, and CR (DT and CR were obtained within one week of CT examination). We evaluated and compared the diagnostic performances of DT and CR for the detection of AAC with MDCT as the reference standard. The extent (four grades 0-3) of AAC on DT and CR was also compared with CT calcium score. Inter-observer agreement was analyzed by using kappa statistics.

RESULTS

On DT, overall accuracy for AAC was superior to that of CR (94% and 71%, respectively, P < 0.01). Inter-observer agreement was good with DT and CR (kappa values = 0.74 and 0.62, respectively) for the presence of AAC, and good with DT and moderate with CR (kappa value = 0.64 and 0.53, respectively) for AAC grading. The overall correlation coefficient on AAC grading between DT and CT (calcium score) was superior to that between CR and CT (0.90 and 0.60, respectively).

CONCLUSION

DT is superior to CR for detection and extent evaluation of AAC.