WA Centre for Health and Ageing, Centre for Medical Research, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e28155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028155. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
The Dementia In Residential care: EduCation intervention Trial (DIRECT) was conducted to determine if delivery of education designed to meet the perceived need of GPs and care staff improves the quality of life of participants with dementia living in residential care.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: This cluster-randomised controlled trial was conducted in 39 residential aged care facilities in the metropolitan area of Perth, Western Australia. 351 care facility residents aged 65 years and older with Mini-Mental State Examination ≤ 24, their GPs and facility staff participated. Flexible education designed to meet the perceived needs of learners was delivered to GPs and care facility staff in intervention groups. The primary outcome of the study was self-rated quality of life of participants with dementia, measured using the QOL-Alzheimer's Disease Scale (QOL-AD) at 4 weeks and 6 months after the conclusion of the intervention. Analysis accounted for the effect of clustering by using multi-level regression analysis. Education of GPs or care facility staff did not affect the primary outcome at either 4 weeks or 6 months. In a post hoc analysis excluding facilities in which fewer than 50% of staff attended an education session, self-rated QOL-AD scores were 6.14 points (adjusted 95%CI 1.14, 11.15) higher at four-week follow-up among residents in facilities randomly assigned to the education intervention.
The education intervention directed at care facilities or GPs did not improve the quality of life ratings of participants with dementia as a group. This may be explained by the poor adherence to the intervention programme, as participants with dementia living in facilities where staff participated at least minimally seemed to benefit.
ANZCTR.org.au ACTRN12607000417482.
住宅护理中的痴呆症:教育干预试验(DIRECT)旨在确定针对全科医生和护理人员的需求提供教育是否可以提高居住在护理机构中的痴呆症患者的生活质量。
方法/主要发现:这是一项在西澳大利亚州珀斯大都市区的 39 个养老院进行的集群随机对照试验。共有 351 名年龄在 65 岁及以上、简易精神状态检查(Mini-Mental State Examination)≤24 的养老院居民、他们的全科医生和护理人员参加了试验。针对学习者的需求,为全科医生和护理人员提供了灵活的教育。该研究的主要结局是使用阿尔茨海默病生活质量量表(QOL-AD)在干预结束后 4 周和 6 个月时评估痴呆症患者的自我报告生活质量。分析考虑了聚类效应,采用多水平回归分析。在 4 周或 6 个月时,全科医生或护理人员的教育均未影响主要结局。在一项排除了少于 50%的护理人员参加教育课程的机构的事后分析中,随机分配到教育干预组的居民在 4 周时的自我报告 QOL-AD 评分高出 6.14 分(调整后的 95%CI 为 1.14,11.15)。
针对护理机构或全科医生的教育干预并未改善整体痴呆症患者的生活质量评分。这可能是由于对干预方案的依从性较差,因为居住在护理人员至少参与最少的机构中的痴呆症患者似乎受益。
ANZCTR.org.au ACTRN12607000417482。