Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Mar;13(3):271-5. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jer270. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cardiac transplant recipients. This study evaluates the usefulness of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and various SPECT-derived diastolic variables to detect CAV in heart transplant patients.
A retrospective review of 141 SPECT studies with corresponding coronary angiograms within 12 months was performed on 99 transplant recipients. Diastolic function was assessed using computer-derived measures of peak filling rate (PFR), time to peak filling rate (TPFR), and mean first one-third filling rate (MFR/3). Angiography identified CAV in 53 of the 141 studies (38%). Of the 53, SPECT identified 7 with reversible myocardial defects (sensitivity 13%) and stress-induced electrocardiographic evidence of ischaemia was seen in one patient (sensitivity 2%). SPECT imaging was negative in 86 of the 88 negative coronary angiograms (specificity 98%). The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 78 and 65%, respectively. If a more stringent definition of CAV was used (≥70% stenosis), the sensitivity and specificity were unchanged (14 and 98%, respectively). There was no statistical difference in diastolic variables between patients with or without angiographic evidence of CAV in regard to PFR (3.57 ± 1.14 vs. 3.18 ± 1.21 EDV/s, P = 0.90), TPFR (149 ± 32 vs. 153 ± 43 ms, P = 0.33), or MFR/3 (1.37 ± 0.43 vs. 1.27 ± 0.42 EDV/s, P = 0.94).
Adenosine stress/rest technetium-99m tetrofosmin-gated SPECT is not a sensitive test for detection of CAV in heart transplant recipients. Diastolic dysfunction, as assessed by SPECT, was not shown to be associated with development of CAV.
心脏同种异体移植血管病(CAV)是心脏移植受者发病率和死亡率的主要原因。本研究评估单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)和各种 SPECT 衍生的舒张变量在心脏移植患者中检测 CAV 的有用性。
对 99 例移植受者的 141 次 SPECT 研究及其在 12 个月内的相应冠状动脉造影进行回顾性分析。使用计算机衍生的峰值充盈率(PFR)、到达峰值充盈率的时间(TPFR)和平均前 1/3 充盈率(MFR/3)等指标评估舒张功能。血管造影在 141 次研究中的 53 次中识别出 CAV(38%)。在这 53 例中,SPECT 检测到 7 例可逆性心肌缺损(敏感性 13%),1 例患者出现应激诱导的心电图缺血证据(敏感性 2%)。在 88 例阴性冠状动脉造影中,86 例 SPECT 成像为阴性(特异性 98%)。阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 78%和 65%。如果使用更严格的 CAV 定义(≥70%狭窄),敏感性和特异性保持不变(分别为 14%和 98%)。在 PFR(3.57±1.14 vs. 3.18±1.21 EDV/s,P=0.90)、TPFR(149±32 vs. 153±43 ms,P=0.33)或 MFR/3(1.37±0.43 vs. 1.27±0.42 EDV/s,P=0.94)方面,有无血管造影证据的患者之间的舒张变量没有统计学差异。
腺苷应激/静息锝-99m 四氟甲氧基磷 SPECT 不是心脏移植受者检测 CAV 的敏感试验。SPECT 评估的舒张功能障碍与 CAV 的发生无关。