Chi Ching-Chi, Kirtschig Gudula, Baldo Maha, Brackenbury Fabia, Lewis Fiona, Wojnarowska Fenella
Department of Dermatology and Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Chiayi, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 6, Sec West, Chia-Pu Road, Puzih, Chiayi, Taiwan, 61363.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;2011(12):CD008240. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008240.pub2.
Lichen sclerosus is a chronic, inflammatory skin condition that most commonly occurs in adult women, although it may also be seen in men and children. It primarily affects the genital area and around the anus, where it causes persistent itching and soreness. Scarring after inflammation may lead to severe damage by fusion of the vulval lips (labia); narrowing of the vaginal opening; and burying of the clitoris in women and girls, as well as tightening of the foreskin in men and boys, if treatments are not started early. Affected people have an increased risk of genital cancers.
To assess the effects of topical interventions for genital lichen sclerosus and adverse effects reported in included trials.
We searched the following databases up to 16 September 2011: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (from 2005), EMBASE (from 2007), LILACS (from 1982), CINAHL (from 1981), British Nursing Index and Archive (from 1985), Science Citation Index Expanded (from 1945), BIOSIS Previews (from 1926), Conference Papers Index (from 1982), and Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (from 1990). We also searched ongoing trial registries and scanned the bibliographies of included studies, published reviews, and papers that had cited the included studies.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of topical interventions in genital lichen sclerosus.
Two authors independently selected trials, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. A third author was available for resolving differences of opinion.
We included 7 RCTs, with a total of 249 participants, covering 6 treatments. Six of these RCTs tested the efficacy of one active intervention against placebo or another active intervention, while the other trial tested three active interventions against placebo.When compared to placebo in one trial, clobetasol propionate 0.05% was effective in treating genital lichen sclerosus in relation to the following outcomes: 'participant-rated improvement or remission of symptoms' (risk ratio (RR) 2.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45 to 5.61) and 'investigator-rated global degree of improvement' (standardised mean difference (SMD) 5.74, 95% CI 4.26 to 7.23).When mometasone furoate 0.05% was compared to placebo in another trial, there was a significant improvement in the 'investigator-rated change in clinical grade of phimosis' (SMD -1.04, 95% CI -1.77 to -0.31).Both trials found no significant differences in reported adverse drug reactions between the corticosteroid and placebo groups. The data from four trials found no significant benefit for topical testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, and progesterone. When used as maintenance therapy after an initial treatment with topical clobetasol propionate in another trial, topical testosterone worsened the symptoms (P < 0.05), but the placebo did not.One trial found no differences between pimecrolimus and clobetasol propionate in relieving symptoms through change in pruritus (itching) (SMD -0.33, 95% CI -0.99 to 0.33) and burning/pain (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.62 to 0.69). However, pimecrolimus was less effective than clobetasol propionate with regard to the 'investigator-rated global degree of improvement' (SMD -1.64, 95% CI -2.40 to -0.87). This trial found no significant differences in reported adverse drug reactions between the pimecrolimus and placebo groups.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The current limited evidence demonstrates the efficacy of clobetasol propionate, mometasone furoate, and pimecrolimus in treating genital lichen sclerosus. Further RCTs are needed to determine the optimal potency and regimen of topical corticosteroids, examine other topical interventions, assess the duration of remission or prevention of flares, evaluate the reduction in the risk of genital squamous cell carcinoma or genital intraepithelial neoplasia, and examine the efficacy in improving the quality of the sex lives of people with this condition.
硬化性苔藓是一种慢性炎症性皮肤病,最常见于成年女性,不过男性和儿童也可能患病。它主要影响生殖器区域及肛门周围,会导致持续性瘙痒和疼痛。炎症后的瘢痕形成若不早期治疗,可能会造成严重损害,如女性大小阴唇融合、阴道口狭窄、阴蒂被埋,以及男性和男孩的包皮紧缩。患者患生殖器癌的风险会增加。
评估局部干预措施对生殖器硬化性苔藓的疗效以及纳入试验中报告的不良反应。
截至2011年9月16日,我们检索了以下数据库:Cochrane皮肤组专业注册库、Cochrane图书馆中的Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE(自2005年起)、EMBASE(自2007年起)、LILACS(自1982年起)、CINAHL(自1981年起)、英国护理索引及存档(自1985年起)、科学引文索引扩展版(自1945年起)、生物学文摘数据库(自1926年起)、会议论文索引(自1982年起)以及会议论文引用索引 - 科学版(自1990年起)。我们还检索了正在进行的试验注册库,并查阅了纳入研究、已发表综述以及引用了纳入研究的论文的参考文献。
生殖器硬化性苔藓局部干预措施的随机对照试验(RCT)。
两位作者独立选择试验、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。如有意见分歧,由第三位作者进行裁决。
我们纳入了7项RCT,共249名参与者,涵盖6种治疗方法。其中6项RCT测试了一种活性干预措施对比安慰剂或另一种活性干预措施的疗效,另一项试验测试了三种活性干预措施对比安慰剂的疗效。在一项试验中,与安慰剂相比,0.05%丙酸氯倍他索在治疗生殖器硬化性苔藓方面,在以下结果上有效:“参与者评定的症状改善或缓解”(风险比(RR)2.85,95%置信区间(CI)1.45至5.61)以及“研究者评定的总体改善程度”(标准化均数差(SMD)5.74,95%CI 4.26至7.23)。在另一项试验中,0.05%糠酸莫米松与安慰剂相比,“研究者评定的包茎临床分级变化”有显著改善(SMD -1.04,95%CI -1.77至 -0.31)。两项试验均发现,皮质类固醇组和安慰剂组报告的药物不良反应无显著差异。四项试验的数据表明,局部使用睾酮、双氢睾酮和孕酮无显著益处。在另一项试验中,局部使用睾酮作为初始外用丙酸氯倍他索治疗后的维持治疗时,症状恶化(P < 0.05),而安慰剂则无此情况。一项试验发现,吡美莫司和丙酸氯倍他索在通过瘙痒(瘙痒)变化缓解症状(SMD -0.33,95%CI -0.99至0.33)和灼痛/疼痛(SMD 0.03,95%CI -0.62至0.69)方面无差异。然而,在“研究者评定的总体改善程度”方面,吡美莫司比丙酸氯倍他索效果差(SMD -1.64,95%CI -2.40至 -0.87)。该试验发现,吡美莫司组和安慰剂组报告的药物不良反应无显著差异。
目前有限的证据表明,丙酸氯倍他索、糠酸莫米松和吡美莫司在治疗生殖器硬化性苔藓方面有效。需要进一步的随机对照试验来确定局部皮质类固醇的最佳效力和用药方案,研究其他局部干预措施,评估缓解期或预防病情复发的持续时间,评估降低生殖器鳞状细胞癌或生殖器上皮内瘤变风险的情况,以及研究改善该病患者性生活质量的疗效。