CNR Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy.
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Jun 20;166(2):475-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.11.037. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
Lack of increase in left ventricular (LV) stroke volume (SV) during low-dose dobutamine stress (LDD) is attributed to exhausted cardiac contractile reserve in failing heart. However, the role of the afterload and preload in SV changes is underestimated. The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of LDD on preload reserve and afterload in patients with non-ischemic heart failure.
58 patients (age 62 years) underwent LDD (up to 20μg/kg/min) using cardiac magnetic resonance.
LV-SV increased by 27% in 24 patients (p<0.001) (SV+), while decreased by 19% in 22 patients (p<0.001) (SV-). The LDD-to-rest reduction in preload, as defined by LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), was more pronounced in SV- than SV+ (24% and 8% respectively, p<0.05). The LLD-to-rest increase in systolic blood pressure to LV end systolic volume ratio, an index of LV contractility, was higher but not statistically different in SV+ in comparison to SV- (70% vs 48%, p=ns). Systemic vascular resistance during LDD tended to be higher in SV- (23%, p=ns), while it was significantly reduced in SV+ (9.5%, p<0.011), whereas arterial elastance (Ea) increased in SV- (30%, p<0.001) but decreased in SV+ (0.5%, p=0.04). At multivariable regression models LV-EF, LV-EDV and Ea significantly contributed to LV-SV changes in all patients. Also among SV+ and SV- LV-EDV and Ea revealed significant contribution to LV-SV change.
At similar contractile reserve response, the lack of LDD-induced increase in LV-SV, can be related to reduced preload reserve as well as to increased afterload.
在低剂量多巴酚丁胺应激(LDD)期间左心室(LV)心搏量(SV)没有增加归因于衰竭心脏的心肌收缩储备耗竭。然而,SV 变化中的前负荷和后负荷的作用被低估了。本研究旨在探讨 LDD 对非缺血性心力衰竭患者前负荷储备和后负荷的影响。
58 例患者(年龄 62 岁)接受心脏磁共振 LDD(最高 20μg/kg/min)。
24 例患者(p<0.001)(SV+)的 LV-SV 增加了 27%,而 22 例患者(p<0.001)(SV-)的 LV-SV 减少了 19%。以 LV 舒张末期容积(EDV)定义的 LDD 与休息时的前负荷减少在 SV-中比 SV+更明显(分别为 24%和 8%,p<0.05)。以 LV 收缩末期容积与收缩压比值表示的 LDD 与休息时的左室收缩性增加,在 SV+中更高,但在 SV-中没有统计学差异(70%对 48%,p=ns)。LDD 期间的全身血管阻力在 SV-中趋于较高(23%,p=ns),而在 SV+中显著降低(9.5%,p<0.011),而动脉弹性(Ea)在 SV-中增加(30%,p<0.001),但在 SV+中降低(0.5%,p=0.04)。在多变量回归模型中,LV-EF、LV-EDV 和 Ea 在所有患者中均显著影响 LV-SV 变化。在 SV+和 SV-中,LV-EDV 和 Ea 也对 LV-SV 变化有显著贡献。
在相似的收缩储备反应下,LDD 诱导的 LV-SV 增加的缺乏可能与前负荷储备减少以及后负荷增加有关。