Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2012 Jan;50(1):34-8. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2011.637047. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
Emergency preparedness has been increasingly recognized as important. Research shows many medical personnel feel unprepared to respond to radiation incidents. Knowledge and attitudes of emergency medicine residents and faculty are largely unstudied, regarding their abilities to provide care for radiation disaster victims. It is unknown whether receiving training in radiological emergency preparedness improves knowledge and attitudes.
(1) Assess the attitudes of emergency medicine residents and faculty toward a radiological disaster; (2) Assess knowledge gaps of emergency medicine residents and faculty regarding radiological emergency preparedness; (3) Assess the attitudes of emergency medicine residents and faculty toward different educational strategies.
An electronic survey was sent to 309 emergency medicine residents and faculty at three U.S. academic institutions. Analyses were performed using SAS 9.0 software.
The survey response rate was 36.6%. Only 37% and 28% of respondents had attended radiological preparedness training in the preceding 5 years or any training in radiation detection, respectively. Higher proportions of trained physicians were: (1) more familiar with DTPA and Prussian blue; (2) more comfortable assessing, decontaminating, and managing victims of radiation incidents; and (3) more comfortable using radiation detectors than their untrained counterparts. Many respondents were unable to differentiate between contamination with and exposure to radiological material. Classroom teaching at the workplace and prepackaged educational materials were most frequently rated as the preferred educational method for radiation preparedness training.
Our results suggest a need for additional radiological-nuclear preparedness training for emergency medicine residents and faculty. Training should include radiation detection, decontamination, explaining differences between radiation exposure and contamination, and teaching patient management, including DTPA and Prussian blue.
应急准备工作的重要性日益受到重视。研究表明,许多医务人员感到无法应对辐射事件。关于急诊医学住院医师和教师对提供辐射灾难受害者护理的能力,他们的知识和态度在很大程度上尚未得到研究。目前尚不清楚接受放射应急准备培训是否会提高知识和态度。
(1)评估急诊医学住院医师和教师对放射灾难的态度;(2)评估急诊医学住院医师和教师在放射应急准备方面的知识差距;(3)评估急诊医学住院医师和教师对不同教育策略的态度。
向美国三所学术机构的 309 名急诊医学住院医师和教师发送了电子调查。使用 SAS 9.0 软件进行分析。
调查回复率为 36.6%。只有 37%和 28%的受访者在过去 5 年中参加过放射准备培训或任何辐射探测培训。接受过培训的医生比例较高的有:(1)更熟悉 DTPA 和普鲁士蓝;(2)在评估、去污和管理辐射事件受害者方面更舒适;(3)更舒适地使用辐射探测器。许多受访者无法区分放射性物质的污染和暴露。工作场所的课堂教学和预制教育材料被评为放射准备培训的首选教育方法。
我们的研究结果表明,急诊医学住院医师和教师需要额外的放射核应急准备培训。培训应包括辐射探测、去污、解释辐射暴露与污染之间的差异,以及教授患者管理,包括 DTPA 和普鲁士蓝。