King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK.
BJU Int. 2012 May;109(10):1546-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10678.x. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
Study Type - Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Frenuloplasty, using common plastic surgical techniques for scar lengthening, is a commonly performed operation amongst urologists for isolated frenular pathology. However, there is very little data in the urological literature regarding either technique or assessment. The only other published study was a questionnaire follow-up with a 23% response rate and the technique used was not clarified. Other studies describe expensive, rarely used procedures and are hampered by small patient numbers or short-term follow-up only. Our study validates the common practice of using plastic surgical techniques for scar lengthening. We have 100% clinical short-term follow-up (3 months) and 91% long-term follow-up (up to 10 years) showing high patient satisfaction scores and low complication and re-operation rates. This provides an evidence base from which to counsel patients who are keen for foreskin sparing surgery for frenular pathology. The extra addition of our grading system allows patients to be risk-stratified as to the risk of re-operation depending on their status at presentation and underlying pathology.
To assess the long-term patient satisfaction and outcomes for penile frenuloplasty when offered as an alternative to circumcision for frenular pain and/or scarring.
Data was prospectively collected over 10 years, for a total of 106 men. The nature of the frenular problem was graded. Techniques of V-Y plasty, Z-plasty or a combination of the two were used. All patients were reviewed at 3 months and contacted via questionnaire ≥ 1 year after surgery. The questionnaire assessed satisfaction, cosmetic appearance, pain on intercourse, need for subsequent surgery and if they would recommend the procedure to a friend.
Follow-up was 100% (106/106) at 3 months and 91% (96/106) ≥ 1 year. Patient satisfaction and cosmesis scores both averaged 8.9/10. Need for subsequent circumcision was 8% (9/96). There were minor complications (bruising/infection/partial dehiscence) in 8% (9/96) of patients. 97% (84/87) of patients would recommend the procedure to a friend.
Penile frenuloplasty is a safe alternative to circumcision. There are high patient satisfaction rates after surgery. Low numbers of patients require a completion circumcision after penile frenuloplasty.
评估当因龟头系带疼痛和/或瘢痕而选择保留包皮手术替代包皮环切术时,阴茎系带成形术的长期患者满意度和结果。
10 年来前瞻性收集了数据,共 106 名男性。对系带问题的性质进行了分级。采用 V-Y 成形术、Z 成形术或两者结合的方法。所有患者均在术后 3 个月进行复查,并通过问卷调查在术后≥1 年进行随访。调查问卷评估了满意度、美容外观、性交时疼痛、是否需要后续手术以及是否会向朋友推荐该手术。
术后 3 个月的随访率为 100%(106/106),术后≥1 年的随访率为 91%(96/106)。患者满意度和美容评分平均为 8.9/10。需要后续行包皮环切术的比例为 8%(9/96)。8%(9/96)的患者出现轻微并发症(瘀伤/感染/部分裂开)。97%(84/87)的患者会向朋友推荐该手术。
阴茎系带成形术是包皮环切术的一种安全替代方法。术后患者满意度高。行阴茎系带成形术后,仅有少数患者需要完成包皮环切术。