So Sarah, Harris Ian A, Naylor Justine M, Adie Sam, Mittal Rajat
South West Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Australia.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2011 Dec;19(3):309-13. doi: 10.1177/230949901101900309.
To determine correlation between metal hypersensitivity and long-term foot and ankle function and pain after internal fixation using stainless steel implants.
60 men and 46 women (mean age, 47 years) who underwent internal fixation for ankle fractures completed a questionnaire 13 to 38 (mean, 26) months after surgery to assess their existing medical condition, history of metal hypersensitivity, problems and outcome of the implant (revision or removal), and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) foot and ankle score. A subset of 12 men and 15 women then underwent patch testing for metal hypersensitivity to molybdenum, chromium, iron, manganese, and nickel. Patients with positive and negative reactions were compared.
21 of the 106 patients underwent removal of the metal implants. The AAOS score was not associated with any of the variables, except for a history of metal hypersensitivity from dental implants and irritation around the surgical scar. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that only irritation around the surgical scar remained associated with poorer AAOS scores. Five of the 27 tested patients had a positive reaction. The mean AAOS scores did not differ significantly between patients with positive and negative reactions (34 vs. 31, p=0.73). Gender was not associated with the test results (p=0.63). None of the 5 patients with a positive reaction underwent revision surgery or reported any history of asthma or metal hypersensitivity. Of the 27 patients, one of the 8 who reported itching, irritation, redness or rash around the surgical scar had a positive reaction, compared to 4 of 19 patients who reported no such symptoms (p=1). Two of the 27 patients reported development of eczema after fixation, one of whom had a positive reaction. Only one of the 27 patients reported a history of metal hypersensitivity to jewellery, but had a negative reaction..
Neither a history of metal hypersensitivity nor positive patch testing correlated with poor outcomes after internal fixation for ankle fractures using stainless steel implants.
确定金属超敏反应与使用不锈钢植入物进行内固定后足踝长期功能及疼痛之间的相关性。
60名男性和46名女性(平均年龄47岁)因踝关节骨折接受了内固定治疗,在术后13至38个月(平均26个月)完成了一份问卷,以评估他们当前的健康状况、金属超敏反应史、植入物的问题及结果(翻修或取出),以及美国矫形外科医师学会(AAOS)足踝评分。然后,12名男性和15名女性的一个亚组接受了针对钼、铬、铁、锰和镍的金属超敏反应的斑贴试验。对反应阳性和阴性的患者进行了比较。
106名患者中有21人取出了金属植入物。AAOS评分与任何变量均无关联,除了来自牙种植体的金属超敏反应史和手术瘢痕周围的刺激。多元线性回归分析表明,仅手术瘢痕周围的刺激仍与较差的AAOS评分相关。27名接受测试的患者中有5人反应阳性。反应阳性和阴性的患者之间的平均AAOS评分无显著差异(34对31,p = 0.73)。性别与测试结果无关(p = 0.63)。5名反应阳性的患者均未接受翻修手术,也未报告任何哮喘或金属超敏反应史。在27名患者中,8名报告手术瘢痕周围有瘙痒、刺激、发红或皮疹的患者中有1人反应阳性,相比之下,19名未报告此类症状的患者中有4人反应阳性(p = 1)。27名患者中有2人报告内固定后出现湿疹,其中1人反应阳性。27名患者中只有1人报告有对首饰的金属超敏反应史,但反应阴性。
金属超敏反应史或斑贴试验阳性均与使用不锈钢植入物进行踝关节骨折内固定后的不良结果无关。