Tromsø Endocrine Research Group, Department of Clinical Medicine, University Hospital of North Norway, Norway.
J Endocrinol Invest. 2012 Oct;35(9):835-40. doi: 10.3275/8191. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
Glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) 6.5% has recently been recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) as an alternative diagnostic criterion for diabetes mellitus (DM).
To evaluate HbA(1c) as an alternative to oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for diagnosis of DM and pre-diabetes and to find the optimal HbA(1c) cut-off points for DM and pre-diabetes in our population.
The subjects were recruited from the Tromsø Study, performed for the 6th time in 2007-2008 with 12,984 participants. All subjects with HbA(1c) in the range 5.8-6.9% and a random sample of subjects with levels 5.3-5.7% were invited to an OGTT.
Among 3476 subjects who completed the OGTT, 199 were diagnosed with DM. The best sensitivity (69.8%) and specificity (81.8%) were found at HbA(1c) 6.2%. For HbA(1c) 6.5% we found a sensitivity of 34.7% and specificity 97.1%. The best cut-off points for impaired fasting glucose (no.=314) and impaired glucose tolerance (no.=404) were found at HbA(1c) 5.9% and 6.0%, respectively. Pre-diabetes detected only by OGTT was associated with worse metabolic characteristics than pre-diabetes detected only by HbA(1c).
The optimum HbA(1c) cutoff point for DM in our population was lower than that proposed by WHO and ADA. To establish more precisely the HbA(1c) levels predictive of micro- and macro-vascular complications, long-term prospective studies are needed. Population- specific optimum cut-off points may be necessary.
糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)6.5% 最近被世界卫生组织(WHO)和美国糖尿病协会(ADA)推荐作为糖尿病(DM)的替代诊断标准。
评估 HbA1c 作为替代口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)诊断 DM 和糖尿病前期的方法,并确定我们人群中用于诊断 DM 和糖尿病前期的最佳 HbA1c 切点。
受试者来自于特罗姆瑟研究,该研究于 2007-2008 年进行了第六次,共有 12984 名参与者。所有 HbA1c 水平在 5.8-6.9%范围内且随机抽取 HbA1c 水平在 5.3-5.7%范围内的受试者均被邀请进行 OGTT。
在完成 OGTT 的 3476 名受试者中,有 199 名被诊断为 DM。在 HbA1c 为 6.2%时,发现最佳的敏感性(69.8%)和特异性(81.8%)。对于 HbA1c 6.5%,我们发现敏感性为 34.7%,特异性为 97.1%。空腹血糖受损(n=314)和葡萄糖耐量受损(n=404)的最佳切点分别在 HbA1c 5.9%和 6.0%。仅通过 OGTT 检测到的糖尿病前期与仅通过 HbA1c 检测到的糖尿病前期相比,具有更差的代谢特征。
我们人群中 DM 的最佳 HbA1c 切点低于 WHO 和 ADA 提出的切点。为了更准确地确定预测微血管和大血管并发症的 HbA1c 水平,需要进行长期前瞻性研究。可能需要针对特定人群的最佳切点。