Cardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rua Rui Vaz Pinto, 220/301 Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21931390, Brazil.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Oct;28(7):1823-8. doi: 10.1007/s10554-011-0002-4. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
The conventional dobutamine (Dob) stress protocol for myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) is long, with frequent adverse effects, and generally requires atropine injection to reach target heart rate. Atropine is usually administered at the end of the protocol, when adverse effects are more frequent. Earlier atropine injection may be useful to shorten the stress protocol and reduce adverse effects. We sought to compare a Dob stress protocol with early atropine injection to a conventional Dob stress protocol in the same patients undergoing MPS. 30 patients underwent Dob-MPS with a conventional protocol (steps of 10, 20, 30 and 40 mcg/kg/min at 3 min intervals, adding atropine to the maximal Dob dose if necessary to achieve 85% of the age-corrected maximal predicted heart rate) and with an accelerated protocol with early atropine injection (at the end of the first stage). We compared stress duration, maximal heart rate (HR), percentage of maximal predicted HR, rate-pressure product, ST changes, MPS scores and the incidence of adverse effects between the 2 protocols. The accelerated protocol was shorter than the conventional protocol (7.1 ± 3.4 min vs. 11.8 ± 1.3 min; P < 0.0001), had the same efficacy to achieve hemodynamic parameters, without increasing adverse effects. The summed stress scores obtained by automatic analysis were similar in both protocols (6.3 ± 6.3 vs. 6.8 ± 6.3; P = NS) as well as the summed difference scores (2.5 ± 3.6 vs. 2.7 ± 3.4; P = NS). Early atropine injection during dobutamine stress protocol shortens stress duration. Our results suggest that patient safety and accuracy of MPS are unaltered, when compared to the conventional protocol, but further, larger studies are still necessary.
多巴酚丁胺(Dob)负荷心肌灌注闪烁显像(MPS)的传统方案耗时较长,且不良反应频繁,通常需要注射阿托品以达到目标心率。阿托品通常在方案结束时给药,此时不良反应更为频繁。早期注射阿托品可能有助于缩短应激方案并减少不良反应。我们旨在比较在相同的 MPS 患者中,早期注射阿托品的多巴酚丁胺应激方案与传统多巴酚丁胺应激方案。30 例患者接受多巴酚丁胺-MPS 检查,采用传统方案(每隔 3 分钟递增 10、20、30 和 40 mcg/kg/min,必要时在最大多巴酚丁胺剂量上加用阿托品以达到年龄校正后最大预测心率的 85%)和早期注射阿托品的加速方案(第一阶段结束时)。我们比较了两种方案的应激持续时间、最大心率(HR)、最大预测 HR 的百分比、心率-血压乘积、ST 改变、MPS 评分和不良反应发生率。加速方案比传统方案更短(7.1 ± 3.4 min 比 11.8 ± 1.3 min;P < 0.0001),达到相同的血流动力学参数疗效,且不增加不良反应。两种方案的自动分析获得的总和应激评分相似(6.3 ± 6.3 比 6.8 ± 6.3;P = NS),总和差值评分也相似(2.5 ± 3.6 比 2.7 ± 3.4;P = NS)。多巴酚丁胺应激方案期间早期注射阿托品可缩短应激持续时间。与传统方案相比,我们的结果表明,患者的安全性和 MPS 的准确性没有改变,但仍需要进一步的、更大的研究。